The Chinese toxic milk powder incident has once again highlighted the problem of China’s soft power in the era of globalization.
Although China’s economic development has kept up with the world and even won it the epithet “factory to the world,” Chinese-made products have time and again caused controversy.
It is not a simple matter of inferior quality: Contaminated products from China have at times proved deadly. In addition to toxic milk powder, China has exported toxic dumplings that sickened people in Japan earlier this year and toxic toys painted with lead paint. It has produced toxic toothpaste and toxic pet food, drawing criticism from the EU and US last year.
Because of globalization, these contaminated products have spread all over the world and this has resulted in an extremely negative view of China’s soft power. Just a few days ago, some people in Taiwan praised the Beijing Olympics as a positive expression of China’s soft power, but the toxic milk powder has become a major international incident affecting public health and has almost completely eclipsed the Beijing Olympics.
Soft power is all about “attraction” and culture is not its only element. In addition to products, a country’s values and the way its government treats the public are integral parts of its image. Undoubtedly, China has its own unique cultural attraction, but the authoritarian regime, limits on freedom of expression, Internet censorship, a widening poverty gap, indirect support of the genocide in Darfur and oppression of Tibet, Xinjiang and Taiwan are all factors that repulse the international community and can hardly be called soft power.
Some Taiwanese politicians and media workers have displayed what has been called “long-distance nationalism” with respect to China — a concept that could be explained as transnational identification with a particular state among a diaspora population. For example, one former diplomat sees China as a future “super power,” while many others would be happy to see China become powerful in terms of its soft power. Is this “power evaluation” appropriate?
It is dangerous to overestimate or underestimate the strength of a country — in particular a country as geographically close and strategically important as China is for Taiwan. Underestimating China is dangerous, but overestimating it could lead to a policy imbalance. This is obviously not a comprehensive or appropriate approach to the globalization of Taiwan, nor does it serve the best interests of its 23 million people.
Can a communist and totalitarian country such as China use its soft power to win the hearts of Western democracies? Have Taiwan’s government, politicians, analysts and general public noted and understood these developments?
Lai Jung-wei is a doctoral candidate at the College of International Affairs at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS