Jian Guangzhou (簡光洲), a reporter at the Oriental Morning Post in Shanghai, on Sept. 11 became the first to report that 14 children in Gansu Province were suffering from kidney disease after consuming toxic milk powder produced by the Sanlu Group. The report dealt the company a vital blow, forced the resignation of several high-ranking government officials and severely damaged China’s national image. But it also saved countless innocent children from toxic milk powder.
Isn’t a journalist’s job to tell the public the truth? Jian wrote on his blog that he feels very sad, not excited, because a renowned enterprise with a long history had lost its sense of social responsibility and some media outlets lost their social consciences after receiving hush money.
The company has a big problem indeed.
But exactly who decided that melamine should be added into the milk powder?
On Sept. 21, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) said that the case exposed the government’s poor monitoring and control practices, but also reflected some companies’ lack of professional and social ethics — bluntly put, a lack of conscience. Wen said that Beijing will look into the responsibility of not only the authorities but also the companies involved and will not let any of them off the hook.
There could be more contaminated products produced by other companies. The question is why people add melamine to milk powder and other dairy products in the first place. How can these companies sacrifice the lives of their own compatriots just to make more money?
Obviously, Wen knows about the problems of his government and Chinese companies’ lack of corporate social responsibility, but he does not understand the change in people’s hearts. In the face of the excessive emphasis on economic development, China has completely ignored public ethics and moral education.
Some Chinese officials helped Sanlu cover its lies. If the journalist had not reported it, how could anyone have possibly known that the whole thing could be so serious?
But could Taiwanese companies bear some fault for being too keen on gaining petty advantages by importing cheap Chinese products? Since melamine is not on Taiwan’s customs checklist, contaminated products have easily slipped through and then spread across the nation.
Some products of Taiwan’s King Car Group were found to contain melamine-tainted ingredients imported from Shandong Duqing in China.
But the Chinese company claims that no melamine was found on its side at the time of export, so the two parties’ statements contradict each other, while the Taiwanese company suffers great losses.
We should seize this chance to review the food import and export process.
Similarly, since we do not want to eat toxic food products ourselves, we should also tighten quality controls for products being exported to other countries.
Exporting and selling toxic milk powder is both ruthless and harmful. As cross-strait exchanges occur in more areas, Taiwan has to learn from this lesson.
It needs to strengthen the cross-strait negotiation mechanism to deal with problems in the regular daily exchanges between Taiwanese and Chinese, in order to encourage both sides to move toward healthier and more sincere interaction.
The milk power contamination problems provide an excellent point of departure for negotiations.
Kung Ling-hsin is an associate professor of journalism at Ming Chuan University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS