US Pacific Command has opened a new channel of communications with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in a continuing campaign that has two objectives: To deter China militarily and to reassure the Chinese that the US is not seeking to contain their country.
The latest US envoys in this endeavor have been senior non-commissioned officers (NCOs) who are responsible for the day-to-day care, feeding, training and work of the soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen. It may be trite, but it is true that they are the backbone of US forces.
In the first venture of NCOs into this military diplomacy, the senior enlisted leader of the Pacific Command, Chief Master Sergeant James Roy, led a delegation of 12 senior NCOs to China recently and is preparing to receive a Chinese delegation in a reciprocal visit to US forces in Hawaii this fall.
Roy emphasized the reasons for the trip to China.
“We did not go to help them to build capacity,” he said in an interview, meaning to strengthen their armed forces.
US military exchanges with China have been controversial with critics, including neoconservatives, who contend that the US should not help China improve its forces.
Instead, Roy said: “We went to understand them better and to have them understand us.”
In less diplomatic terms, that meant learning more about the capabilities of the PLA and demonstrating the ability of US NCOs — the men and women of their services — to get things done.
Sino-US military relations have traveled a bumpy road for many years. The current tone appears to have been set by US Admiral Dennis Blair, who headed Pacific Command in 1999. In testimony before a congressional committee, he asserted that US military leaders sought to get two points across to the Chinese:
First, he said: “We’re not sitting here planning to contain China. We’re not sitting here dying to pick a fight with China. We basically are an armed force in a democratic society who will fight if must but prefer not to. And we’ll support American interests if we have to, but don’t mess with us.”
He also said: “We are very aware in our program of not giving away more than we get from these exchanges. We’re not doing it to be nice guys. We’re doing it to get our job done, of teaching the Chinese what sort of capability we have out there.”
In recent years, several US secretaries of defense and top military officers have visited China and received their counterparts in Washington.
In addition, exchanges of middle grade officers, those who will lead their respective services in the next 10 or 15 years, have begun. Now the senior NCOs have been tasked to gauge the quality of Chinese NCOs and to impress the Chinese with US training and experience.
The PLA, having been an unschooled army that relied on human wave tactics in the Korean War and later, has recently begun to develop qualified NCOs. Chinese leaders, a Pentagon report said in March, are concerned that “low education levels in the PLA negatively affect its operating capability and professionalism.”
During the week the US delegation was in China, they engaged in discussions mostly with Chinese officers, not with NCOs, and toured bases in the Nanjing military district. The Chinese, Roy said, asked “very few stray questions. They had a good idea of why we were there.”
Even so, the US concept of a NCO corps puzzled the Chinese.
“The Chinese do not yet understand the role of the senior NCO in the US military service,” Roy said.
Pointing to the chevrons on his sleeve, he said: “They did not understand that a chief master sergeant as the senior enlisted leader of the Pacific Command is not a commander.”
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry