The Internet is still very young. It was only November 1977 when a group of computer scientists successfully connected three networks around the world. It took until 1989 for the Internet to become commercially available and about another decade after that for it to achieve widespread household use in Europe and the US. Only then did we emerge from what I think of as the “Internet comma” days, when its mention in the media was always followed by a comma and a short description.
From there, we’ve got to the point where I, because of my long history with the technology, now run afoul of style guides. I remain convinced that as a unique entity the word requires capitalization. You’ll see that the newspaper is so comfortable with the term that it doesn’t.
This reflects that in a very short time the Internet has had a profound impact on the way we live, so it’s hardly surprising that some people have expressed skepticism of its effects. Writing in Atlantic magazine, for example, Nicholas Carr recently asked whether Google is making us stupider, while Doris Lessing’s Nobel lecture in December included what many saw as an attack on the Internet.
Yet such a transformative technology is bound to ruffle a few feathers. I have no doubts that its social repercussions will take decades to be fully understood, but it has already done much to benefit the world. It has provided access to information on a scale never before imaginable, lowered the barriers to creative expression, challenged old business models and enabled new ones. It has succeeded because we designed it to be both flexible and open. These features have allowed it to accommodate innovation without massive changes to its infrastructure.
And innovation on the Internet happens at a rapid pace. Ten years ago, Google was simply an idea being explored by two graduates in California. The years to come will offer more that is new and exciting. It’s easy to forget, however, just how far the Internet still has to go. Today, there are only about 1.4 billion users, representing a bit more than one-fifth of the world’s population and a substantial amount of the content on the Web is still written in English. But the Internet is becoming more global. Asia has more than 500 million users and Europe nearly 400 million and Internet-enabled mobile phones will help extend the net to Africa, Latin America and the Indian subcontinent. We’re about to see further waves of innovation.
There are more than 3 billion mobiles in use today and more than 80 percent of the world’s population live within range of a network. In areas where wireline or WiFi access barely exists, many new users will first experience the Internet through a mobile phone. In developing economies, people are already finding innovative ways to use mobile technology. Grameen’s micro-finance and village phone programs in Bangladesh and elsewhere are known and respected around the world, but there are many less famous examples. During the Kenyan elections, Mobile Planet provided its subscribers with up-to-the-minute results by text message. As the cost of mobile technologies fall, the opportunities for such innovation will continue to grow.
We’re nearing the tipping point for mobile computing to deliver timely geographically and socially relevant information. Researchers in Japan recently proposed using data from vehicles’ windscreen wipers and embedded Global Positioning Systems receivers to track the movement of weather systems through towns and cities with a precision never before possible. It may seem academic, but understanding the way severe weather, such as a typhoon, moves through a city could save lives. Further exploration can shed light on demographic, intellectual and epidemiological phenomena, to name just a few areas.
It’s amazing how quickly those of us with Internet access have come to take for granted the remarkable amounts of information we have at our disposal, but we’re only seeing the beginnings. The bulk of human knowledge remains offline. As more of us get access to the Internet, more of the world’s information will find its way online.
The Web is already making strides toward becoming truly global. While I was chairman of Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, one of the organizations that helps ensure that the Internet works uniformly around the world, we adopted rules to allow the system of domain names to accommodate non-Roman characters, making the Web more accessible to people whose languages use other scripts, such as Arabic, Korean or Cyrillic.
There are improvements in automatic language translation tools and, in particular, the field that we call machine learning. It is already possible to do a Google search and explore the results in English across web content in 23 different languages, from Czech to Hindi to Korean. Speakers of any of those languages can now explore content on the web written in any of the others.
The technology isn’t perfect yet, but it’s rapidly improving. Even in its present form, it’s easy to imagine a not-too-distant future in which automatic translation will allow two people in the world to message one another in real time, each experiencing the chat in his or her tongue. Just imagine what a significant step that will be.
The technological progress of the Internet has set huge social changes in motion. As with other transformative innovations before it, from the telegraph to TV, people will continue to worry about the effects; the printing press and the rise in literacy that it effected were long seen as destabilizing forces. Similar concerns about the Internet are being raised, but if we take a long view, its benefits far outweigh the discomforts of learning to integrate it into our lives.
After working on the Internet for more than three decades, I’m more optimistic about its promise than ever. It has the potential to change unexpected parts of our lives: from surfboards that let you surf the web while you wait for the next wave to refrigerators that can email you suggested recipes based on the food you already have.
My colleagues at Nasa and I are even working on an interplanetary Internet, which will make getting information to and from spacecraft in the far reaches of the solar system more reliable.
Closer to home, we’re at the cusp of a truly global Internet that will bring people closer together and democratize access to information. We are all free to innovate on the net every day and we should look forward to more people around the world enjoying that freedom.
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS