TECO Electric and Machinery Co has recently come under a lot of pressure because its chairman, Liu Chao-kai (劉兆凱), is the younger brother of Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄). As a result, the Bureau of National Health Insurance has decided not to renew its contract with TECO to make the National Health Insurance Card in view of the Civil Servants Conflict of Interest Prevention Act (公職人員利益迴避衝突法).
I could not help thinking about the concept of “original sin” and how this incident reflects the excessive attempts by some people to rectify problems. Do all government officials have to be people without parents, brothers or sisters and no family history? It seems so if they wish to stop people from being jealous and insulting them.
Looking to other countries, Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) brother Lee Hsien-yang (李顯揚) remains chief executive officer of Singapore Telecommunications and continues to serve the public and help develop infrastructure. Jeb Bush, brother of US President George W. Bush, was governor of Florida while their other brother Neil Bush was a cofounder of an e-learning software company. The Bush brothers have served the public and been involved in business, maintaining a separation of public affairs and private benefits. Another example is Hong Kong: When Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) was chief executive, his father’s shipping company continued to operate, even on government business.
In Taiwan, however, there is the “sin” of family relations. A strange anti-business attitude lies behind the idea that the law shall be strictly adhered to, running counter to how business is done in other countries.
I would find it acceptable if the bureau wanted to change the manufacturers of the National Health Insurance Card because the cards were inferior or too expensive, or if they were only used by a minority of people so that a change of manufacturer did not affect the rights of 1.8 million people.
It is not acceptable, however, that the bureau switches manufacturers of the card simply because of a family relationship, because this involves not only changing a manufacturer, but also increasing social disruption and distrust and inflicting major losses on the public.
The health insurance cards are not manufactured by Liu Chao-kai alone. Has anyone considered the rights of the other employees? After having won a tender in accordance with the law and invested in materials and manpower, the company should not be asked to give it all up without compensation — whoever is more suitable should be doing the job. The bureau’s decision may avoid a minor conflict, but it damages overall public welfare. Wasting public resources because of family relationship makes everyone the loser.
On Aug. 1, a newspaper reported that 71.89 percent of business owners said business is worse this year than last year — foreign companies are leaving Taiwan and the information-technology (IT) industry is in a trough. If these companies can’t make money now, they are not likely to return later.
On Aug. 5, the stock price of seven IT companies ranged from NT$6 to NT$13.15. If the IT industry does not get the respect it deserves, if these companies are involved in public non-profit projects and if policies are issued and retracted on a whim, then how will they regain even a basic investment? Soon they will be left with nothing but international contract manufacturing.
If the government’s goal is to only look at the facts and look beyond the pan-green/pan-blue conflict, then society at large should also look only to the facts and not to family relationships.
Rosemary Ho is a former consultant for the Executive Yuan’s IT and Structural Reform Committee.
Translated by Drew Cameron and Perry Svensson
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS