With increasingly high oil and electricity prices, many Taiwanese are trying to come up with ways to conserve energy and reduce carbon emissions. International oil prices have already risen above US$143 per barrel and some estimates even say prices could reach US$200 per barrel before too long. While high oil prices do not mean we are facing a shortage of oil products, they do mean that we could be facing such shortages within three to five years.
Domestic development of renewable energy sources have been stuck in the testing and promotion stages, and because the draft renewable energy development bill has not yet been passed by the legislature, business entities have hesitated to proceed in developing new technologies.
The government’s energy policy seems to ignore the use of organic waste from the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. Such organic waste includes animal droppings — such as cow and pig dung and poultry droppings — as well as waste from the production of processed food including bread, kitchen waste and oil and grease. Environmental Protection Administration statistics on garbage generated in Taiwan show a total of 618,000 tonnes of garbage in March, of which 42 percent was organic waste, while the recycling rate of kitchen leftovers, including compost, pig feed and other leftovers, was only 9.35 percent. Extrapolating these numbers, it can be estimated that within one year, Taiwan will have 15,737,000 tonnes of domestically produced organic waste.
Of the developed counties, Germany is the most skilled in the use of agricultural organic waste. On Aug. 23 last year, Germany made new goals for renewable energy use, saying that by 2020, it would use renewable energy in 25 percent to 30 percent of the nation’s production of power, 14 percent of which would be used in the production of thermal energy while 17 percent would be used on biomass oils. Germany has approximately 5,000 biogas stations that use various types of feedstock to produce biogas that is then turned into electricity and thermal energy via cogeneration equipment. Because of the competition for land between bio crops and traditional food crops, bio crops have changed somewhat and now use organic waste as ingredients along with expired alugel and other medicines that contain lactic acid bacteria disposed of by hospitals.
Studies conducted in Germany show that for each tonne of pig and cow dung, 25m³ to 36m³ of biogas can be produced. Each tonne of oil and grease waste can be used to make 400m³ to 600m³ of biogas; each tonne of leftovers from bread manufacturing can be used to make 486m³ of biogas and each tonne of kitchen leftovers can be used to make 220m³ of biogas.
Some biogas stations have started to look into ways to purify and turn biogas into natural gas, as this would help reduce dependence on farmland needed to make biomass fuels. These plants are also using excess thermal energy to dry timber.
Bio raw materials are an alternative way to produce traditional foods and fibers as well as an alternative way to earn income. The government should start to think about using organic waste products to earn money and encourage people to think of the dollar value of dirt.
In addition to passing the renewable energy development bill, the government should adopt the following measures.
First, it should adjust energy development targets. Although biofuels cannot totally replace fossil fuels, the government can make moves toward separating energy sources. Making full use of agricultural and non-agricultural waste and organic waste to produce biogas and then turning that into electricity and gas and using these in air-conditioning and hot gas dryers is more environmentally friendly and could also increase the income of farmers.
Second, the government should look at current garbage processing methods and incinerators. Recyclable waste — especially organic waste — can be used to make biogas which can then be used to make electricity or gas. In addition, amendments could be made to the renewable energy development bill and could include sections that encourage the creation of biogas infrastructure.
Third, the government should differentiate the energy market between users of different energy sources such as oil, electricity and gas. For example, bigger users such as those in the industrial sector could use fossil oils and electricity, while smaller users, such as normal households in the countryside or in the suburbs, could rely on biogas plants, which use organic waste as fuel, to provide the electricity, gas and biogas they require.
While renewable energy cannot totally replace fossil fuels, turning waste products into energy is an option that Taiwan should follow.
Huang Wan-tran is vice president of the Chung Chou Institute of Technology.
Translated by Drew Cameron
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS