Way back in December 1999, prior to the election of the first Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) government, then Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Shen Fu-hsiung (沈富雄) wrote a piece in the Taipei Times arguing that direct cross-strait flights were viable and necessary. Companies from Taiwan and China could form a consortium to work a way around the diplomatic impasse, he argued.
It was strong stuff for a DPP legislator at the time, if only because it was pragmatic and realistic.
Shen was also prepared to do something that most DPP hacks would not dare: criticize former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) for her frequently absurd and embarrassing remarks, regardless of the subject.
For this willingness to speak on matters with clarity and intelligence, even when it conflicted with the ideological preferences of his party, Shen attracted a degree of support from voters who were sick and tired of partisan wrangling. His approach after that time was to forge a middle ground and from that space find new solutions.
But in early 2004, Shen began to snipe at his own party, the administration and the first family after a brief but strange disappearance, in the process alienating his colleagues and amusing his opponents — and thus securing the tag of “lone bird.”
Then his political star fell in the most humiliating manner when he failed to gain re-election to the legislature that year. For a man who apparently enjoyed so much support from a pragmatic electorate, the result showed he had lost touch with a functional political base.
It was a terrible blow: He didn’t just lose his seat — he lost his ability to speak for anyone other than himself.
Since then, Shen has been prone to erratic or self-absorbed behavior — but always self-promoting. He has spent endless hours on pro-blue-camp talkshows in an attempt to forge his beloved middle ground, trying to make sense out of cable TV drivel and in the process dignifying some of the nation’s most discredited politicians.
Shen is now back in the limelight with a failed nomination for the vice presidency of the Control Yuan. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) apparently saw in him a middle ground figure who could speak to both sides of the political spectrum, and who possibly made the symbolism of the nomination of hardline Mainlander Wang Chien-shien (王建火宣) to the Control Yuan presidency more palatable.
Shen’s latest rejection — this time at the hands of the legislature — is a sign of how Ma’s would-be agenda of inclusiveness is being disregarded by a legislature under his party’s —not his — control.
For Shen, however, the appropriate feeling is one of pity rather than indignation.
Despite his pragmatism, his sincere attempts to open a dialogue with the KMT, his appeal for inter-party consensus and, crucially, support from the president, he has failed to comprehend the politics of the day. The KMT has laughed in his face and voted him into oblivion.
Shen has been humiliated all over again — by people he had always thought could be his friends.
It is therefore time for him to do what so many promise when things go wrong in politics, yet so few achieve: retire from this seedy profession and, while there is still time, forge a new career in his twilight years that bears some semblance of dignity.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS