I was deeply touched by a recent news report about the difficulties that a Thai woman, Yang Hsin-mei (楊心梅), had in obtaining legal Taiwanese identity for two decades despite being married to a Taiwanese man and having a daughter here.
No government agency was willing to help her, and no one took her problem seriously from the time a broker tricked her out of her passport before her wedding 21 years ago. That all changed when she stole some cream in March and was deported from Taiwan for overstaying her visa.
Does she regret not stealing something 21 years ago? If she had, she could have bid a last farewell to her mother who died in Thailand several years ago and would not be so ill owing to various physical and psychological hardships.
The Ministry of the Interior has some 400 petitions from overseas Chinese descendants from Thailand and Myanmar living in Taiwan without residence permits. Most of the petitioners are second or third-generation descendants of soldiers in the Nationalist army who retreated to Thailand and Myanmar from China in 1949. Their fathers are in their 80s now, and they still praise Sun Yat-sen’s (孫逸仙) Three Principles of the People. They continue to love the motherland, and their loyalty remains unwavering. They still believe the government’s promise that it will bring them home, although they know in their hearts that the chances are slim. But they simply refuse to believe that the government would forget them.
Today, their children have undergone hardship and finally returned to what they feel is their homeland, thinking that their wishes have come true. Instead, they are seen as a burden passed down from history, and they are trapped by unfriendly policies and cold, rigid regulations.
When I think of this, I want to tell their old fathers that their country really has forgotten them, and that the good times are nothing but memories.
Why can’t these 400 petitioners be granted the status they so fairly deserve, both according to reason and to the law? Do they all have to steal something at a convenience store or a supermarket to turn their plight into a social issue that attracts public attention, so that their cases are taken seriously and given reasonable treatment?
Last year, Wu Shou-chung (吳守忠) committed suicide following a failed and prolonged attempt to apply for Taiwanese residence.
This year, a young outstanding overseas Chinese student at National Taiwan University jumped off an 11-story building to end his life because of financial difficulties and his stateless status.
These people shouldn’t have had to end their lives. If the government had shown some sympathy to them and given them a chance to legally live in Taiwan, they could be alive today.
After reading about Yang, I feel sympathy for her. I wonder whether or not the 400 petitioners will have to follow her example to be able to put an end to their statelessness.
These people never know how long they will have to spend trying to gain the basic recognition that is the right of every human being. Although some people may not care about their identification card, others have to spend decades trying to obtain an identity, and in vain.
How many more people are still hoping to obtain a household registration and an ID card so that they can enjoy basic human dignity?
Angela Lee is a member of the Thai-Burma Region Chinese Offspring Refugee Service Association.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND TED YANG
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS