President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has been in power for more than a month. During this period, three salient topics have called for analysis.
First is the oil price hike. The government defines this problem as a result of “global inflation pressures.” Although this is true, Ma barely touched on this topic during the election campaign and has yet to tell the public how to deal with the pressure.
Ma has only pledged to conserve energy and reduce carbon emissions, while ascertaining whether key officials at the Presidential Office carry a handkerchief or use reusable utensils. What a painful disappointment this must be for the more than 7 million voters who cast their ballot for him.
Ma should propose more concrete plans to ease the pain caused by inflation. Some simple but straightforward measures are in order. For example, a large number of people would benefit if the government were to halve national highway tolls.
Second is the government’s plan to expand domestic demand. The point is not whether this is a post-election “thank you” to local governments, as the opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) claims. Rather, this plan should be viewed as part of the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) economic policy.
To the KMT, the rationale behind this plan is simple: The public will not suffer if economic growth outpaces price increases. However, the average blue or white-collar worker will not see immediate pay increases even if the economic growth rate increased.
Worst, economic policies like demand expansion could initiate an endless series of expansion processes as incomes are forced higher to keep up with the price hikes. This pursuit is destined to fail.
Third is cross-strait relations. This issue is the main focus of Ma’s administration and has garnered the highest approval. It is unlikely that the DPP would score any points for its recent attacks on the cross-strait issue, as the crux of the matter is not whether direct cargo flights would also be implemented or whether Taiwan has denigrated itself. The focus should be the significant changes that would take place once direct flights commence and Chinese tourists arrive in Taiwan.
The government has yet to tell the public how it intends to handle these challenges. What is clear is that the KMT has a fixed track in mind for cross-strait relations. Following this, Taiwan and China would inevitably get closer. This is not a big problem; the problem is what will happen once this has happened. Putting aside contentious issues such as whether Ma should be addressed as “President Ma” or “Mr Ma,” the question remains: Where will this track lead us?
If what Ma really wants is unification with China, the KMT’s plan should remain unchanged. However, if Ma intends to keep the promises he made in his inaugural speech and work to safeguard the dignity and sovereignty of Taiwan, or the Republic of China, he should propose a concrete plan to consolidate public consensus on Taiwan’s independence and sovereignty while pushing it toward China. Over the past month, we have seen the latter, but not the former.
Ma has said that he has kept the memory of the Tiananmen Square Massacre in mind since that fateful event 19 years ago. Now that Chinese tourists are coming to Taiwan, he can do a lot of things to let them understand the true nature of the Beijing regime and thus open up another track for cross-strait relations.
For example, he could distribute free DVDs highlighting the truth about the massacre. He could also use this opportunity to promote Taiwanese democracy so they can see Beijing’s real face.
In short, there are many things that Ma and his government can but have not even started to do. I believe this is a result of misdefining Taiwan’s future. It is perhaps too early for anyone — especially the DPP, which had just given up power — to grade the new government. Still, from now on, the Ma administration should take the public’s hopes for the nation’s future seriously.
Yao Jen-to is an assistant professor at National Tsing Hua University’s Graduate Institute of Sociology.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In December 1937, Japanese troops captured Nanjing and unleashed one of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. Over six weeks, hundreds of thousands were slaughtered and women were raped on a scale that still defies comprehension. Across Asia, the Japanese occupation left deep scars. Singapore, Malaya, the Philippines and much of China endured terror, forced labor and massacres. My own grandfather was tortured by the Japanese in Singapore. His wife, traumatized beyond recovery, lived the rest of her life in silence and breakdown. These stories are real, not abstract history. Here is the irony: Mao Zedong (毛澤東) himself once told visiting
When I reminded my 83-year-old mother on Wednesday that it was the 76th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, she replied: “Yes, it was the day when my family was broken.” That answer captures the paradox of modern China. To most Chinese in mainland China, Oct. 1 is a day of pride — a celebration of national strength, prosperity and global stature. However, on a deeper level, it is also a reminder to many of the families shattered, the freedoms extinguished and the lives sacrificed on the road here. Seventy-six years ago, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東)
RSS