President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has been in power for more than a month. During this period, three salient topics have called for analysis.
First is the oil price hike. The government defines this problem as a result of “global inflation pressures.” Although this is true, Ma barely touched on this topic during the election campaign and has yet to tell the public how to deal with the pressure.
Ma has only pledged to conserve energy and reduce carbon emissions, while ascertaining whether key officials at the Presidential Office carry a handkerchief or use reusable utensils. What a painful disappointment this must be for the more than 7 million voters who cast their ballot for him.
Ma should propose more concrete plans to ease the pain caused by inflation. Some simple but straightforward measures are in order. For example, a large number of people would benefit if the government were to halve national highway tolls.
Second is the government’s plan to expand domestic demand. The point is not whether this is a post-election “thank you” to local governments, as the opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) claims. Rather, this plan should be viewed as part of the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) economic policy.
To the KMT, the rationale behind this plan is simple: The public will not suffer if economic growth outpaces price increases. However, the average blue or white-collar worker will not see immediate pay increases even if the economic growth rate increased.
Worst, economic policies like demand expansion could initiate an endless series of expansion processes as incomes are forced higher to keep up with the price hikes. This pursuit is destined to fail.
Third is cross-strait relations. This issue is the main focus of Ma’s administration and has garnered the highest approval. It is unlikely that the DPP would score any points for its recent attacks on the cross-strait issue, as the crux of the matter is not whether direct cargo flights would also be implemented or whether Taiwan has denigrated itself. The focus should be the significant changes that would take place once direct flights commence and Chinese tourists arrive in Taiwan.
The government has yet to tell the public how it intends to handle these challenges. What is clear is that the KMT has a fixed track in mind for cross-strait relations. Following this, Taiwan and China would inevitably get closer. This is not a big problem; the problem is what will happen once this has happened. Putting aside contentious issues such as whether Ma should be addressed as “President Ma” or “Mr Ma,” the question remains: Where will this track lead us?
If what Ma really wants is unification with China, the KMT’s plan should remain unchanged. However, if Ma intends to keep the promises he made in his inaugural speech and work to safeguard the dignity and sovereignty of Taiwan, or the Republic of China, he should propose a concrete plan to consolidate public consensus on Taiwan’s independence and sovereignty while pushing it toward China. Over the past month, we have seen the latter, but not the former.
Ma has said that he has kept the memory of the Tiananmen Square Massacre in mind since that fateful event 19 years ago. Now that Chinese tourists are coming to Taiwan, he can do a lot of things to let them understand the true nature of the Beijing regime and thus open up another track for cross-strait relations.
For example, he could distribute free DVDs highlighting the truth about the massacre. He could also use this opportunity to promote Taiwanese democracy so they can see Beijing’s real face.
In short, there are many things that Ma and his government can but have not even started to do. I believe this is a result of misdefining Taiwan’s future. It is perhaps too early for anyone — especially the DPP, which had just given up power — to grade the new government. Still, from now on, the Ma administration should take the public’s hopes for the nation’s future seriously.
Yao Jen-to is an assistant professor at National Tsing Hua University’s Graduate Institute of Sociology.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS