Since becoming head of state, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has maintained that, based on the Constitution, the premier is the administrative chief who has the highest authority over most domestic matters, while the president’s responsibilities chiefly lie in diplomacy, national defense and cross-strait relations.
Ma cited the Constitution for his silence amid public furor over rising fuel and commodity prices and farmers’ calls for help following flooding in the south.
The president’s recent conduct, however, appears to give lie to his argument.
On Friday, students, parents and alumni from Tainan County’s Tsungyeh Elementary School staged a demonstration outside the Ministry of Education, urging the ministry to stop the county government’s plan to close the school because of its remote location and low enrolment.
The following day, while visiting Hongye Elementary School in a remote part of Taitung County, the president spoke on behalf of Tsungyeh Elementary School, saying that closing down the school requires a review as it could widen the education gap between urban and rural areas.
Ma again surprised many on Tuesday, when he weighed in on the issue concerning former Ministry of Education secretary-general Chuang Kuo-rong (莊國榮).
Chuang on Saturday implied that National Chengchi University’s refusal to renew his teaching contract was politically motivated retaliation for his verbal attacks on Ma when he was running for the presidency.
Ma said he respected the university’s decision not to renew Chuang’s contract, but added that the school’s disciplinary action against Chuang appeared to be “disproportionate” to the deed and called on the public to give Chuang another chance.
This seems a long way from Ma’s emphasis on respecting “the administrative boundaries” by not jumping to the frontline. Maybe Ma has forgotten that Tsungyeh Elementary School falls under the jurisdiction of the Tainan County Government and that Chuang’s case falls under the authority of the school.
Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) sought to fend off criticism by saying that Ma has spoken in Chuang’s defense because the issue stemmed from Chuang’s controversial remarks implying that Ma’s late father had an affair with his goddaughter. As for Ma’s comment on Tsungyeh Elementary School, Wang said that providing for education in the nation’s remote areas was part of Ma’s campaign platform.
Maybe. But this makes it difficult to understand why Ma hasn’t spoken a word about the plummeting stock market and public complaints over their deteriorating finances despite his campaign promise that the stock market would surge to 20,000 points and that the economy would improve if he was elected.
These incidents suggest a disturbing pattern in how Ma builds his public image. While he is eager to jump to the frontline and take credit for speaking for the “underdog,” he is as quick to take cover and hide behind the Constitution when the issue appears difficult and troublesome, such as the flooding in southern Taiwan and soaring commodity prices.
It is early days, but nonetheless disturbing to see the president shirk his responsibilities when the going gets tough and choose short cuts when the political effects are to his advantage.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS