The scandal had all the makings of a tabloid blockbuster: A soap opera actor accused his wife, another popular television star, of infidelity with his close friend and an Italian chef who was giving her private cooking lessons.
The actor, Park Chul, pressed charges against his wife, Ok So-ri, and the two men under South Korea’s adultery law, which prohibits extramaritaal affairs and can land those found guilty in prison for up to two years.
Then the 39-year-old Ok took the drama a step further. She admitted to having an affair (with the friend, not the chef). And she filed a petition in court, challenging the constitutionality of the 55-year-old adultery statute.
With that move, she turned a messy marital struggle into a public battle over the country’s changing mores.
Like many countries, South Korea has long been troubled by contradictions over sex outside marriage. Until this century, women faced ostracism — shunned even by their birth families — if they cheated on their husbands, but men, especially wealthy ones, were allowed to keep concubines.
Now, even as some hold to fairly puritanical standards — sex education in schools is still discouraged — the country’s strict social code seems to be weakening somewhat. Divorce is becoming more common, and so-called love motels, which cater to guests having illicit sex, are opening throughout the country.
Those who support the adultery law see it as the last bulwark against the “free-sex culture of the West,” while opponents call it an anachronism.
“The state meddling in which sex partner we should have — that’s too much,” Lim Sung-bin, Ok’s lawyer, said this month after a three-hour hearing at the Constitutional Court, where his client did not appear. “Such a time is gone.”
The nine-member court said it would rule on the case soon. It is deliberating Ok’s suit, along with three other petitions against the adultery law, all filed in the past year.
South Korea is among a dwindling number of non-Muslim countries where an adultery conviction can earn a jail sentence. About 70 percent of South Koreans support the adultery law, according to surveys conducted in recent years by the government and the news media.
Each year, more than 1,200 people are indicted under the law, and about half are convicted.
“Some argue that no law should intrude beneath the quilt,” said Han Sang-dae, a Justice Ministry official who defended the law during the Constitutional Court hearing. “But if we allow freedom for extramarital affairs, it will threaten our sexual morality as well as monogamy, a foundation of our society.”
The Constitutional Court has ruled three times in favor of the adultery law, the last time in 2001.
The challenge also comes as the law is losing some of its staunchest backers. Two long-standing champions of women’s rights and the adultery law — the Korean Women’s Association United and the Ministry of Gender Equality — say it is time for South Korea to consider abolishing it.
Women’s groups had been some of the strongest supporters of criminalizing adultery. In the past, most adultery suits were filed by wives against husbands; the law gave them leverage in a society where women had little recourse against their husbands’ infidelity.
With their economic and legal status rising, many women no longer fear divorce or feel that they need a law to help them deal with a cheating husband. And with a growing number of men applying the law against their wives, women are questioning whether the protections it offers are worth the risks.
“Adultery was once considered something only husbands could do,” said Kwak Bae-hee, president of the Korea Legal Aid Center for Family Relations, a nongovernmental agency. “But now women think they can do it too, and some of them actually do it.”
Park filed divorce and adultery lawsuits last October, saying he had evidence that his wife had engaged in extramarital affairs with an Italian chef in a Seoul hotel and with an opera singer who was a friend of Park’s.
In a highly unusual move for a South Korean woman embroiled in a sex scandal, Ok called a news conference to defend herself. After confirming her relationship with her husband’s friend, she explained in shocking detail why she had had an affair.
“I had a very lonely and unsatisfied marriage because of a loveless husband,” Ok said, fighting back tears. “We only had sex 10 times in our 11 years of marriage.”
Park told a news conference that he felt like “an innocent pedestrian hit by a car ... Ninety-eight percent of what she said was either distorted or wrong.”
The case against Ok was suspended while the Constitutional Court deliberated the law.
Many of those who oppose the adultery law say it is so difficult to build a criminal case that the law is impractical. A conviction requires proof of sexual intercourse, leading some spouses who believe they have been wronged to raid motel rooms, accompanied by police officers.
However, only 47 people of those convicted of adultery last year ended up behind bars.
Some experts also find it absurd that South Korea criminalizes adultery while there is no law against incest. Still, many think it is too early to rescind the adultery law. In a country where many women silently suffer their husbands’ infidelity out of fear that a divorce could leave them impoverished, adultery charges remain a potent tool to secure a better financial settlement or child custody, Kwak said. Although divorce laws have become more equitable, the men usually receive most of the family’s wealth.
Ha Ji-eun, a student at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, said she believed that the law still offered important protections.
“Korean men, many of them, still get away with adultery because women are weak,” Ha said. “It was as recently as during my grandparents’ days that men brought in concubines and kicked out their wives. If this law is abolished, I am sure women will suffer more.”
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS