On Dec. 21, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀) announced a new compensation system for the chipmaker’s employees next year, including a 15 percent increase in base salaries beginning on Jan. 1.
In a video message, Chang told employees that the hike in base salaries was part of structural changes to the company’s compensation system. But the move also showed that TSMC is working to attract and retain employees amid intensifying competition.
Following a series of actions to cut or freeze salaries beginning late last year to cope with the global financial crisis, several Taiwanese technology companies have now announced — or are considering — upward adjustments in employee paychecks.
According to various reports, Acer Inc, Compal Electronics Inc, AU Optronics Corp and MediaTek Inc are among the iconic tech firms likely to raise employee salaries next year. Companies in the real estate sector such as Sinyi Realty Co, Farglory Land Development Co and Chong Hong Construction Co are also reportedly planning salary hikes.
Even so, it is too early to say the economy is on a firm footing and growing across the board. Last week, a local job bank’s poll showed that 37 percent of local firms have considered raising employee salaries next year, while 58 percent had not.
The truth is that many Taiwanese companies are still fighting to stay in business and are hesitant to hire for want of solid signs of recovery. That’s why the nation’s unemployment rate fell only to 5.86 percent last month from 5.96 percent the previous month — meaning there are still 645,000 people out of work.
The national statistics bureau said 150,000 jobs would need to be added to the market before the headline jobless rate can fall below 5 percent. That is a very challenging goal, though it should be noted that the Council for Economic Planning and Development last week unveiled targets for next year that include an unemployment rate of 4.9 percent.
But a serious problem remains: The number of people who have been unemployed for more than one year — whom statistics officials refer to as “long-term unemployed” in their surveys — totaled 112,000 last month, up 4,000 from the previous month and marking the highest monthly level since January 2004.
In addition, the number of unemployed middle-aged and elderly people reached 141,000 last month, up 3,000 from the previous month and the highest in three months.
The problem facing people in these categories is that they face more obstacles in getting back into the workforce than any other category of jobseeker. This predicament poses a potential threat to the finances and stability of a large number of families in the long term.
Another concern relating to the strength of economic recovery is the continuing decline in wages in the industrial and services sectors, which in turn hurts companies and discourages consumer spending.
The decision by some companies to raise employee salaries next year is welcome news as it points to recovery in their sectors.
However, even though economic growth is likely to be registered next year, uncertainties remain in the labor market and a noticeable increase in household income is not likely to emerge anytime soon.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS