Just when it looked as if the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) fortunes were beginning to turn the corner, the party once again finds itself in the middle of a full-blown crisis. And, yet again, it is one entirely of its own making.
The source of the trouble this time is one place that is usually not cause for concern for the party: Tainan County.
On Wednesday, the party named Legislator Lee Chun-yee (李俊毅) as its candidate for December’s county commissioner election. But in doing so, it ignored former minister of foreign affairs and two-time former county commissioner Mark Chen (陳唐山), despite numerous polls showing higher support ratings for Chen.
In going against public opinion, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) says the party has opted for a generational change. At the same time, however, Tsai is trying to stamp her authority on the party and make a clean break with the past.
Factional considerations may also have played a role. Although the party supposedly abolished its factions in 2006, Mark Chen is close to — and the preferred choice of — former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Tsai is taking a risk. A split pan-green vote would open the door for a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) victory in a place the DPP has controlled for the last 16 years. Nor is Tainan a place the DPP can afford to lose, given the challenges it faces in other parts of the country.
Pan-green incumbents in the south are already under pressure because of the central government’s uneven distribution of development funds — which has left DPP-controlled authorities with the short end of the stick — and an apparent boycott of pan-green counties and cities by Chinese tourists.
Meanwhile, the questionable legal proceedings against Chiayi County Commissioner Chen Ming-wen (陳明文) and Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬) will test the pair’s ability to win re-election.
Add to that the trial involving the former first family and the damage this has done to the party’s reputation — ammunition already used by KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) ahead of the Da-an by-election — and the DPP may struggle to keep pan-green counties and cities, let alone woo pan-blue ones.
Nevertheless, the DPP must have been encouraged by last week’s showing in Da-an and the electorate’s apparent discontent with the KMT administration. It may be looking ahead to December’s elections with a new sense of optimism.
But Mark Chen’s challenge could bring that to an end.
At 74, he may still be popular, but he should also have the wisdom to acknowledge that what the party needs now is unity.
Tsai’s low-key stewardship since taking the helm last May has been a breath of fresh air compared with the tumult in the party’s recent past. But in December, she will need to show that her leadership produces results.
Mark Chen, meanwhile, must recognize that by undermining Tsai’s leadership at this crucial moment, he would not only harm Tsai, but also the party and its cause, which should be far more important than any individual.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS