King Car Industrial Co, a reputable company in the food business, chose to purchase ingredients for its powdered instant beverages and soups from Duqing Inc in China’s Shandong Province as a means of diversifying sourcing and ensuring a constant supply of raw materials in the face of rising prices and commodity shortages.
When news came out about contaminated milk powder from China, King Car asked Duqing if melamine — an industrial chemical used to make plastics and fertilizers — was present in any of its products.
Duqing gave its word that there was none. Nevertheless, in the interests of consumer health and safety and acting on its own initiative, King Car sent samples of all its products to the Food Industry Research and Development Institute for testing.
The firm’s powdered instant beverages tested positive for melamine.
As soon as King Car received the results, the firm took a number of steps to resolve the issue.
It informed the Department of Health, recalled affected products, checked its remaining stock of possibly tainted items and kept them under lock and key.
The company also set up a hotline to deal with consumer inquiries and complaints and announced its willingness to accept responsibility for and pay compensation to any consumers who had suffered ill effects.
In contrast, at least until Thursday last week, Duqing covered up the facts by sending King Car a written guarantee that its products did not contain melamine.
There is a stark contrast between these two companies — one Taiwanese and the other Chinese — in their attitude to consumer protection and their willingness, or reluctance, to accept corporate responsibility for their actions.
I have a few suggestions on how to deal with this case and companies that behave like this.
We should encourage companies to take the initiative to send suspicious product samples for testing, and recall all products and take remedial measures whenever contamination is found.
At the same time, we should condemn companies that ignore the safety of customers and cover up the facts. In such cases, the Department of Health should promptly inform the World Health Organization, while consumers’ groups should report such incidents to the global consumer protection body Consumers International.
Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) should immediately protest to Beijing through existing channels of communication.
Second, the government should test all processed and unprocessed foodstuffs imported from China to safeguard consumer health.
In the spirit of corporate accountability, importers should test samples of their products or send them to qualified laboratories for testing before placing them on the market.
The SEF and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait should negotiate terms for testing foodstuffs traded in both directions and establish a procedure of mutual notification.
Duqing hid the truth and had no regard for the health of its customers. It knew that its products were contaminated with melamine but issued a document guaranteeing that they were melamine-free. This constitutes a criminal act.
Importers should file suit for compensation, because crimes like these should not be tolerated.
Lee Shen-yi is honorary chairman of the Consumers’ Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG AND EDDY CHANG
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS