While the nation engages in heated discussion about the Papua New Guinea fund scandal, Taiwan's sovereignty is being trampled internationally. The media ignores this and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs seems to be busy with internal troubles.
Late last month, crew members from a Greenpeace ship boarded the Taiwanese tuna boat Nian Sheng 3 while it was fishing in the southwestern Pacific Ocean. Not finding any proof of illegal activities, the activists escorted the ship out of international waters, with the excuse that they wanted to protect tuna. These actions violate Taiwan's right of sovereignty over ships flying its flag in international waters.
But all Taiwan did was have the Fisheries Agency issue some weak protests and send a letter to the secretarial office of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) asking it to uphold justice. Greenpeace is not a member of the WCPFC, but even if it were, the commission is a management organization with no power to handle rights violations -- in any case, the WCPFC's next meeting isn]t until the end of this year. The actions of the Fisheries Agency are not only too late, they are also aimed at the wrong recipient. Meanwhile, the foreign ministry has done nothing. Then early this month Greenpeace again raided another Taiwanese ship, the Ho Tsai Fa 18.
Ships in international waters fall under the jurisdiction of the country where the ship is registered -- its flag state. This is one of the fundamental principles of international law. The ship's captain has no right to allow others to board the ship, and any such action that has not been agreed to by the authorities of the flag state is illegal and constitutes a clear and serious infringement of national sovereignty.
In 1989, Taiwanese fishing boats were found salmon fishing, perhaps illegally, in the north Pacific near the US. A boat from the US Coast Guard asked permission for observers to come aboard to investigate, which Taiwan categorically refused. Although observers were worried that the Taiwanese boat would dump the fish to destroy the presumed evidence, the US ship only followed the fishing boat for a few thousand nautical miles until it reached Taiwanese waters, where local authorities took control of the investigation. That a country as big and strong as the US doesn]t dare to board a foreign fishing boat shows its respect for this fundamental rule.
A system for boarding boats in international waters was implemented in the central and western Pacific this year -- the most advanced measure taken so far by any international fishery organization to enforce laws on protection and management. Taiwan has dedicated many years and dozens of negotiation rounds to arrange mutual boarding mechanisms with different countries. Countries that want crew to be allowed to board Taiwanese fishing boats can only do so after agreeing to give Taiwan the same rights.
To implement this mechanism, the US, New Zealand, France and Canada have already registered their ships. At this crucial moment, Greenpeace's repeated actions pose a serious threat to the future of the mechanism. If Taiwan doesn]t understand how to voice its determination to protect its national sovereignty, then it will be hard to imagine how registered ships from other countries will treat Taiwan's ships in the future.
Several things can be done to help remedy the situation.
First, the foreign ministry should send a letter to Taiwan's representative office in the Netherlands to be delivered to Greenpeace headquarters, lodging a protest and demanding a public written apology. If Greenpeace stands by its reckless actions, then Taiwan should use its position as a member of international fishery management organizations to block Greenpeace's status as an observer.
Second, the Coast Guard Administration should dispatch ships as soon as possible to closely monitor Taiwanese fishing boats, showing that Taiwan is sincere in protecting and managing fishing resources and following the laws of the sea and the relevant rules of western and central Pacific fishery groups. It would also show the international community that Taiwan is determined and able to defend its jurisdiction over vessels registered under the Taiwanese flag.
Third, the Fisheries Agency should point out that crews of boats of other countries are not allowed to board Taiwanese fishing boats in international waters without permission from the Taiwanese government, regardless of the boat's nationality. If this results in any damages, Taiwan should follow the precedent set by the "temporary enforcement line†standard between Taiwan and Japan, and the government should take all responsibility.
Chiang Huang-chih is an associate professor at National Taiwan University's College of Law.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
RSS