Following its bruising defeat in the March 22 presidential election, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has behaved like a chicken with its head cut off, making lots of noise but without resolute voice, leaving its supporters shaking their heads and wondering what will happen to the party.
At a time of feeble faith and wounded leadership, the DPP is well advised to look to a statement once made by former US president John F. Kennedy in a speech he delivered in April 1959.
“When written in Chinese, the word ‘crisis’ is composed of two characters. One represents danger and the other represents opportunity,” he said.
Indeed, times of crisis often provide opportunities for change.
Following DPP Chairman Frank Hsieh’s (謝長廷) resignation after his defeat in the presidential election, the party decided to hold a chairmanship election on May 18. A debate will be held for all candidates on May 10 after the weeklong period for candidacy registration closes tomorrow.
So far, a number of party members of various generations have expressed an interest in the chairmanship.
This is a good sign.
However, as the registration kicks off, there are talks of a generational shift as the old guard is asked to take a backseat in the election, while others have randomly thrown out names to see who is interested in running.
Being the leader of a political party is a serious matter. DPP members should be reminded that the best qualities in a leader lie not in one’s age, appearance or gender, but in the characteristics of the individual.
Just as young hopefuls should not be laughed at for being naive, elderly candidates should not be branded as “out of touch” and cast aside. Nor should someone be put at the forefront simply for assuming the role of “reformer.”
Leadership requires more than just standing at the helm and receiving cheers of support when things are going well. A good leader needs to generate strength and confidence at times of crisis and low spirit, and inspire the country to see the light at the end of tunnel.
The most important quality of all is integrity.
The world of politics does not need any more “political vultures” — those who are fickle on principle and bend too easily.
The party needs a leader who is adamant about upholding the party’s core values.
It is no secret that the majority of DPP supporters are blue-collar workers, but what has the party done in these eight years to improve their living standards?
Since it came to power, we saw the DPP waver on its stances. Different factions busily scrambled for resources, while many forgot what the party stood for — the pursuit of democracy, environmental protection, social justice and help for the disadvantaged.
No doubt the party has disappointed many, losing supporters along the way.
If the DPP wishes to regain the trust and support of the public, the future chairperson needs to walk on firm ground, holding fast to the party’s founding spirit, believing in the party’s core values.
So, at the time of “crisis,” will the change be for better or for worse?
Will the DPP rebound successfully?
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS