It is an indication of how desperate the Chinese government has become that it should blame the Western media for “distorted reports and coverage” on Tibet.
The Associated Press quoted Kuang Weilin (鄺偉林), deputy consul-general at the Chinese consulate in New York, as saying on Thursday that the Western media, and CNN and the BBC in particular, had produced “misleading reports and comments, distorted facts and wrong conclusions, wrong judgments.”
Even casual audiences would find this comment amusing, especially given that CNN and BBC were singled out for “cropping” photos, a practice — together with airbrushing — that the Chinese government itself mastered long ago to eliminate political liabilities.
Whereas countries like Cuba and even Zimbabwe tend to attack media outlets based on their national ties, China has gone one further by implying that the Western media as a whole have launched a conspiracy against Beijing by aligning themselves with the Dalai Lama and Tibetan “independence forces” in a program of mass deception.
As dissembling statements go, this one is right up there with warnings of Tibetan suicide bombers and the nefarious activities of the ubiquitous — yet oddly invisible — “Dalai Lama clique.”
What is remarkable, and sad, about this situation is that when faced with new challenges to its credibility, 21st century China is reverting to the traditional and least credible response: Blaming foreigners en masse and creating enemies within where none need exist. It is “unfair treaty” psychology writ large for globalized media and economies. It is also breathtakingly infantile and will gain no friends among foreigners with money to invest.
It is crucial to understand that the Chinese approach to this issue will not restrict itself to unhappy minorities. With China touting itself as the next capitalist mecca (albeit without such troubling language), economists and financial analysts must harbor some concern that the inevitable economic lull will be accompanied by similar attacks on the foreign media attempting to hold the Chinese government and industry to account.
The professional kleptocracy of Singapore has mastered the balance of an unfree press and relatively transparent information on trade and policy. As much as the Singaporeans would love China to grow in sophistication using its candy-coated autocracy as a model, the basic dilemma is that Beijing has neither the independent agencies nor the skills to emulate its Confucian cousin.
China’s development can only be assured if the government can relent and have faith in the ability of its own people to speak and to be heard without fear of retribution. This is all the more important now that foreign investment places pressure on the government to modernize its regulatory systems and legal channels.
But China does not — indeed, in its current state, cannot — believe in a free press. This means that any “evidence” it presents to rebut allegations and reports — even on economic subjects — can be no more credible than the florid junk that Cultural Revolution wordsmiths churned out to disguise turmoil and praise mismanagement.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS