On Wednesday, Liao Shu-hsin (廖述炘), the director of a pro-independence underground radio station in Taipei, allegedly immolated himself in his grief over the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) loss in the presidential election. Liao reportedly felt that his dream of seeing a “Republic of Taiwan” established was no longer possible.
While Liao’s love for Taiwan should be honored and respected, no one should throw away the gift of life, no matter how bleak the future may seem.
Liao’s death was a wake-up call for the DPP, which, in the wake of its loss to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in the March 22 presidential election, seems to have forgotten its supporters and become obsessed with infighting and jockeying for power.
Politics is a subject that inspires the deepest passion, and many of pan-green supporters are understandably saddened by the DPP’s disastrous electoral performance, which started with the devastating legislative elections in January. Then, as the KMT gathered strength from its newly won two-third majority in the legislature, it thrashed the DPP again last month, when its presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) garnered 2.2. million votes more than the DPP’s Frank Hsieh (謝長廷).
What many senior DPP leaders may not realize, however, is that the election losses are not in themselves what disappointed supporters the most. Rather, the inappropriate behavior of certain DPP figures during the campaigns that was most disturbing.
With calls from inside and out of the party for reflection and renewal, the public has been treated to a sad show as some DPP members eagerly take advantage of the situation to play the blame game. Constructive reflection and changes are needed, but these are far more difficult than self-righteous finger-pointing.
Senior DPP leaders have shirked responsibility in the name of being humble. A notable exception was Vice President Annette Lu’s (呂秀蓮) gift of “charcoal in snowy weather” (雪中送炭) two days after the presidential election, when she led some 100 new members to join the DPP as internal morale was at a nadir.
Other than that, the DPP appears to be in a great mess with no one seems willing to step up to the plate.
Traditionally, candidates make rounds after the election, regardless of whether they won or lost, to visit and thank supporters. Only after 10 days did Hsieh emerge from his post-election hibernation to thank his supporters on Wednesday.
Although Hsieh, who continues to serve as DPP chairman, may have been bogged down with post-election party matters, or he may simply have needed time to reflect along with other senior party officials on the significance of the defeat and party’s future, the DPP will certainly go nowhere without its grass roots. Reaching out to a disappointed and grieving support base should have been one of Hsieh’s top priorities.
Leadership is more than making decisions and standing at the helm when things are going well. It entails boosting party morale after crushing defeats, inspiring hope and creating visions of a renewed party at a time when everything looks bleak.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with