A young woman applies her makeup, pouting into a handheld mirror as she adds the finishing touches to her lips. In the next seat, a young businessman bellows into his mobile phone and across the aisle, a middle-aged "salaryman" executes chin-ups on an overhead handrail, blissfully unaware that his overcoat is brushing the legs of the woman seated in front of him.
A montage of life on a Tokyo commuter train this week -- and proof that the Japanese, supposedly the most courteous people on Earth, are forgetting their manners.
Decrying the decline in standards of public behavior is a favorite pastime the world over, but in Japan the handwringing is not confined to stuffy social commentators.
A recent survey by the Asahi Shimbun daily found that nine out of 10 Japanese believe that manners have deteriorated to critical levels -- a trend that in recent times has prompted requests for members of parliament to refrain from texting during debates and for broadsheet readers to fold their newspapers on rush-hour trains.
As they witness a rising incidence of "carriage rage" and other displays of what they consider "un-Japanese" conduct, many Japanese are wondering what has become of a society in which just about every social interaction was governed by a time-honored code of conduct.
Japan is, after all, a place where business cards are exchanged with both hands and accompanied by a bow of appropriate depth; where a simple "Excuse me" can be delivered using one of several expressions; where blowing one's nose at the table is almost unforgivable; and where people over a certain age conclude phone calls with a respectful bow to their unseen interlocutor.
Not surprisingly, the worst culprits seem to be concentrated among the millions who squeeze daily into packed commuter trains. Another recent survey found that more than 75 percent of people said their patience had been tested while using public transport.
Topping the list of offenses was talking loudly in groups, followed by mobile phone chatter, unruly children accompanied by nonchalant parents and "leaky headphones."
Other breaches include taking up more than one seat, rushing on to trains before other people have stepped off, applying makeup and reading pornographic comic books.
In Yokohama, a port city south of the capital, transport authorities have had enough. From next week, a crack squad of "etiquette police" will patrol subway carriages and politely ask passengers to give up their seats to elderly, pregnant or disabled passengers.
Members of the Smile-Manner Squadron, most of whom are well over 60, hope to embarrass young miscreants into vacating their seats rather than allow them to nap or, more commonly, to pretend to be asleep, while those in greater need of a rest are left standing.
The 11 enforcers -- officially known as "manner upgraders" -- will wear bright green uniforms so that they can be easily spotted by offenders. Each will be paid about US$14 a day and accompanied by a younger bodyguard in case a snoozing salaryman takes exception.
"Even though everyone talks about manners, you'd be surprised how tough it was to come up with definitions of what exactly is meant by proper behavior on trains," a spokesman for Yokohama's transport bureau told the Weekly Yomiuri magazine.
"We're going to keep looking into this, but for the time being we're just going to issue gentle warnings to anyone who is clearly out of line," he said.
Taizo Kato, a psychologist at Waseda University, told the magazine the Yokohama crackdown "symbolizes the collapse of the Japanese mentality and shows that we have reached a point where citizens are not aware of basic human manners."
The manner malaise is spreading beyond trains and platforms. Among the other offenders cited in the Asahi poll are neighbors who fail to separate their rubbish into burnable and non-burnable items and smokers who puff while walking along crowded city streets.
Many of the vices would barely raise an eyebrow in Britain. In a past attempt to stamp out inconsiderate behavior on public transport, the Tokyo government's list of etiquette crimes included carrying large bags, wearing strong-smelling perfume and -- one for the weekend golfer working on his swing -- using an umbrella as a makeshift 9-iron.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS