I often hear TV news broadcasters use the word "isolationism" when criticizing the government's China policies. A closer look at the local TV news stations, however, indicates that it is the local media themselves that are suffering from isolationism.
I followed developments surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence. Apart from a few reports and commentaries in the print media, there was almost nothing on the TV news apart from scattered mentions.
I was thus forced to turn to CNN, the BBC and other international media outlets to gain a deeper understanding of events in Kosovo. This begs the question of where those who don't speak anything but Mandarin or Hoklo should turn. Could it really be that Kosovo's independence is of no interest at all to Taiwan, a nation that wants nothing more than to become a full member of the international community?
We will only be further disappointed if we look to TV news for information on other international news related to Taiwan.
A week ago, several former US government officials and experts on East Asian strategy in the Taiwan Policy Working Group published a report titled Strengthening Freedom in Asia: A Twenty-First Century Agenda for the US-Taiwan Partnership. In it, they make some important recommendations to the US government, such as affirming Taiwan's leading position in Asia in terms of technology, economy and democracy, confirming the strategic importance of Taiwan and advising that the US must not see Taiwan as an adjunct to Sino-US relations.
The contents of the report were worthy of deeper analysis. Unfortunately, most TV stations either ignored or only briefly reported it. I monitored one of the news stations most persistent in its critique of the government for almost an hour and it did not say a word about the report.
At a Washington seminar last month Bonnie Glaser of the Center for Strategic and International Studies mentioned a study conducted by Chinese academics on Taiwan's upcoming presidential election, citing their prediction that there might only be a narrow margin of 6 percent between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷). Perhaps I am ignorant and ill-informed, but I do not remember seeing this news reported on local TV.
Although such news events happen overseas and are categorized as "international news," they are closely related to Taiwan in light of their regional significance. But news stations either ignore them or only mention them briefly. If the media are not active even when dealing with news related to us, how would they deal with international news that appears to be unrelated to us?
As for the media channels that often push the government to loosen its cross-strait policy, they themselves seldom report China's situation and problems, and fail to give us an understanding of whether we are dealing with friends or foes. Regardless of whether we support unification or independence, shouldn't people on both sides of the Strait at least have some general understanding of each other?
According to research, narratives of more than 1,000 words cause impatience in most readers. Fewer people read newspapers now, and their in-depth grasp of news correspondingly weakens. Hence the electronic media have become the fastest and most convenient conduit for information.
But news stations are not fully realizing their responsibilities. They focus on political confrontation, social incidents and even entertainment gossip, bombarding the audience with the same news again and again.
Although some weekly news programs do occasionally cover international headlines, the proportion is still insignificant -- let alone the fact that some falsify news reports.
Even the most popular political commentary shows in Taiwan restrict themselves to the confrontation between the blue and green camps without a sense of right and wrong. Their general attitude is one of disinterest with any other issues.
No wonder the Taiwanese public is unaware of the international situation and has little awareness for matters that should be general knowledge. This is a result of the media's "isolationism," and their neglect to perform their duty to disseminate information.
Hsu Yu-fang is an associate professor of Chinese at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Eddy Chang
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS