On Feb. 18, Academia Sinica's research group for environment and energy resources took aim at global warming by issuing a statement addressing the government's energy policy, but the different players seem to focus only on the position of former Academia Sinica president and Nobel laureate Lee Yuan-tseh (
DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) has made a vague statement, saying the DPP is against building new nuclear reactors, but since the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is not new, it can be discussed, regardless of the DPP's position against nuclear energy. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) says he not only wants to continue construction of the power plant, but that he wants to speed up construction.
Forces in civil society have built a consensus for a "nuclear-free homeland," but political players appear to be ignoring this consensus, leading to worries that it will be difficult to discuss the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and energy policy rationally.
The DPP benefitted from the support of the social forces that came together in opposition to the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, but after coming to power, the DPP government's unskilled handling of the issue has tainted the reputation of the anti-nuclear movement. Now Hsieh reaffirms that the DPP is against building any new nuclear reactors, but says existing reactors can continue to operate. This not only goes against the spirit of the DPP's charter, but also eradicates a piece of popular history. It is in fact the same view that the KMT took during the debacle surrounding the government's attempt to close down construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in 2000.
The reality is that choosing nuclear energy to counter global warming doesn't contribute to the sustainable development of Taiwan and will instead delay and reduce the development of renewable energy sources.
Academia Sinica's statement said that if the safety of nuclear energy can be assured and nuclear waste can be handled properly, construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant should continue, while the continued operation of the first three power plants with additional reactors could be considered. But the statement didn't fully assess whether those first two prerequisites have been met. The statement also ignores recent news that the Taiwan Power Company decided on its own to change the design of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in 395 places, thus potentially creating a safety hazard.
As to the nuclear waste issue, the Taipei County government was recently fined NT$300 million (NT$9.7 million) for storing too much nuclear waste from the first and second nuclear power plants in water basins. Doesn't this alert us to the fact that the nuclear waste problem still has not been solved?
While academics argue that a "nuclear-free homeland" goes against the international mainstream, Let us not forget the results of a 2006 poll carried out by the EU. In the poll, 61 percent of respondents said that even though nuclear power can reduce carbon emissions, they still hoped that the proportion of nuclear energy could be reduced because of the latent danger, in particular since large volumes of carbon dioxide are emitted in the extraction of nuclear fuels, the construction of power plants and the treatment of nuclear waste.
Past estimates of energy needs during Taiwan's industrial development resulted in predictions that the country would encounter power shortages, hence the need for the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant. But 20 years later, Taiwan doesn't suffer from power shortages and we have learned that the main issues are power management and estimating power needs.
Princeton University professors Stephen Pacala and Robert Socolow conducted research on how to solve the climate problem with existing technologies. Their research shows that if global production of nuclear power triples over the next 50 years, carbon dioxide emissions could be reduced by 1 billion tonnes. However, improving the energy transport system could reduce carbon emissions by twice as much, and increasing energy efficiency could reduce emissions by three times as much. Even measures like reforestation can reduce carbon dioxide emissions by twice as much as the use of nuclear power. Against the current backdrop of greenhouse gas considerations, to propose the continued construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and the continued use of existing nuclear power plants with additional reactors and hope that nuclear energy will reduce greenhouse gas emissions is unrealistic.
The good news is that at the last moment of the presidential election campaign, energy policy is being discussed.
Unfortunately, while both candidates scramble for ideas brought up by academics, bending their former positions or emphasizing that quick action is needed, they quietly put the recommendation aside. On the one hand they talk about saving energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, while on the other hand they quietly allow the construction of Formosa Plastics Corp's steel mill and a Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology plant, two projects that consume a lot of energy and emit 10 percent of the country's greenhouse gases. Politicians and academics should talk with the people who live near those sites.
Let us hope the public can understand why greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced and soon and can change their ideas on production and consumer behavior. Only then will there be an opportunity to avert the global warming crisis.
A "nuclear-free homeland" must be realized. The wish for a Taiwan without nuclear power plants comes from social forces that care about Taiwan's environment. It's a value every person could subscribe to and it must not be used for the advantage of any one political party.
Tan Ui-chi is secretary of the Green Citizens' Action Alliance.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS