At first glance, the resounding defeat of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's party in parliamentary elections might seem a setback to the US battle against terrorism.
After all, Musharraf has been a key ally in the fight against al-Qaeda. The election results could bring heavy public pressure to bear on the next Pakistani government to cooperate less with the US.
But there are also reasons for optimism. Pakistan appears headed toward its first elected civilian government after eight years of military rule. And while top Musharraf supporters were repudiated, the winning opposition parties are politically moderate. The vote was also a rebuke to Islamist parties, which lost control of a province where al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters have sought refuge.
The outcome holds the possibility of restoring order in a country whose population is weary of violence.
US President George W. Bush, on a trip to Africa, said: "It's now time for the newly elected folks to show up and form their government. The question then is: Will they be friends of the United States? I certainly hope so."
US officials were cautious in trying to piece together the Pakistan puzzle, including uncertainty over whether Musharraf can survive in power and who exactly will become the country's new prime minister and other top leaders.
"We need Pakistan as an important ally," Bush said. "We've got interests in helping make sure there's no safe haven from which people can plot and plan attacks against the United States of America and Pakistan."
Bush's trip was rocked by three foreign-policy developments in as many days: the Pakistani elections, Fidel Castro's resignation as president of Cuba after nearly half a century in power and Kosovo's declaration of independence from Serbia.
All have ramifications for US policy, with the Pakistani shake-up bearing directly on the US struggle against terrorism.
"Nothing is more important than giving the moderate majority a clear voice and a clear stake in the system," said Senator Joe Biden, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
He depicted the election as offering the US a chance to reshape its policy to one less centered on a single leader.
Musharraf and the US have a strained relationship at best.
Since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the administration has lionized him as a key ally, a politically moderate leader capable of maintaining order in the world's only nuclear-armed Islamic country.
Under US prodding, he reversed Pakistan's support for the fundamentalist Taliban regime in neighboring Afghanistan and helped round up al-Qaeda militants and the Taliban tribesmen who helped them.
But his path to power -- through a coup in 1999 -- always seemed at odds with Bush's agenda to spread democracy. And some critics have questioned the depth of Musharraf's recent commitment to hunting down militants and pressing the search for Osama bin Laden. Since Sept. 11, the US has given Pakistan some US$10 billion in aid, most of it for the military.
Musharraf is extremely unpopular in his own country, even after he relinquished his rank of army general last year and retired from the military. That unpopularity has stoked anti-US feeling and threatens to erode Pakistan's cooperation in fighting terrorism.
Rick Barton, a Pakistan expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the role Musharraf will now play is an open question.
Should Musharraf voluntarily relinquish power, "it could lead to a peaceful transition and would signal the country has moved into another stage of political development," he said.
If he hangs on defiantly, it could "essentially stalemate the system," he said.
It is not clear just who Pakistan's next leaders will be -- or whether the new parliament could force Musharraf out.
The parties of slain former prime minister Benazir Bhutto and former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, the leader Musharraf ousted, won enough seats to form a new government, though they will likely fall short of the two-thirds needed to impeach the president.
Sharif on Tuesday called again for Musharraf to step down. Musharraf spokesman Rashid Qureshi said, however, that the president intends to work with the new government and will serve out his term, which expires in 2012.
Though he was unclear what that new government will look like, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said Musharraf's party is not the only potential partner.
Bhutto's party, in particular, "feels acutely the threat from violent extremists and terrorism, having had their party leader recently assassinated," McCormack said.
Michael O'Hanlon, a foreign policy expert at the Brookings Institution, said the shake-up in Pakistan's government "could be one of those counterintuitive things where someone who seems less hardline and pro-Western, who is a little less to our liking, may end up doing a better job" in rounding up terrorists. "I wouldn't rule that possibility out at all."
A Facebook post by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) earlier this month achieved record levels of engagement — although perhaps inadvertently. In it, he attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for an op-ed published in 2014 discussing drug harm reduction policies. In attempting to stir up fear with talk of community centers, drugs and needles, Chiang’s comment section exploded. More than 100,000 comments poured in within the first two hours; more than 330,000 after the first 12; and more than 400,000 by noon the following day. Rather embarrassingly, many commenters made a point
Southeast Asian food delivery platform Grab Holdings Ltd in March applied to acquire Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda operations in Taiwan, with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) scheduled to announce its decision on Oct. 27. On the surface, the deal is a business merger — but in substance, it involves personal data, national geospatial information and digital sovereignty. It cannot be assessed solely in terms of market share and price competition. Grab has extensive and long-standing connections to Chinese capital. In 2015, Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing and China Investment Corp, a sovereign wealth fund, invested in Grab. Grab invested in Chinese autonomous-driving
The official English name for Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen’s (沈伯洋) campaign is “the Taipei Current.” It comes from the Chinese term yangliu (洋流), a direct translation of which would be “Ocean Wave,” using the last character of Shen’s name, yang (洋, “ocean”). The Chinese term is a reference to the 2018 campaign for Kaohsiung mayor that swept a hitherto marginal player within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who is now legislative speaker, whose successful campaign then was termed the “Han Wave” (韓流). Shen’s usage of the Chinese term is intentional.
The relocation of Taipei International Airport (Songshan Airport), which Taipei mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) proposed on Thursday, has been debated for years. Mayoral candidates have previously advocated preserving the site as a park and green space, which I would have no objection to. However, plans for the site to undergo intensive development would risk overloading the land’s carrying capacity and seriously exacerbate the severity of potential earthquakes. While a major offshore megathrust earthquake would severely affect Taipei and New Taipei City, movement along the Shanchiao Fault (山腳斷層) could mean an earthquake or subsidence event taking place right underneath the city,
RSS