At first glance, the resounding defeat of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's party in parliamentary elections might seem a setback to the US battle against terrorism.
After all, Musharraf has been a key ally in the fight against al-Qaeda. The election results could bring heavy public pressure to bear on the next Pakistani government to cooperate less with the US.
But there are also reasons for optimism. Pakistan appears headed toward its first elected civilian government after eight years of military rule. And while top Musharraf supporters were repudiated, the winning opposition parties are politically moderate. The vote was also a rebuke to Islamist parties, which lost control of a province where al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters have sought refuge.
The outcome holds the possibility of restoring order in a country whose population is weary of violence.
US President George W. Bush, on a trip to Africa, said: "It's now time for the newly elected folks to show up and form their government. The question then is: Will they be friends of the United States? I certainly hope so."
US officials were cautious in trying to piece together the Pakistan puzzle, including uncertainty over whether Musharraf can survive in power and who exactly will become the country's new prime minister and other top leaders.
"We need Pakistan as an important ally," Bush said. "We've got interests in helping make sure there's no safe haven from which people can plot and plan attacks against the United States of America and Pakistan."
Bush's trip was rocked by three foreign-policy developments in as many days: the Pakistani elections, Fidel Castro's resignation as president of Cuba after nearly half a century in power and Kosovo's declaration of independence from Serbia.
All have ramifications for US policy, with the Pakistani shake-up bearing directly on the US struggle against terrorism.
"Nothing is more important than giving the moderate majority a clear voice and a clear stake in the system," said Senator Joe Biden, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
He depicted the election as offering the US a chance to reshape its policy to one less centered on a single leader.
Musharraf and the US have a strained relationship at best.
Since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the administration has lionized him as a key ally, a politically moderate leader capable of maintaining order in the world's only nuclear-armed Islamic country.
Under US prodding, he reversed Pakistan's support for the fundamentalist Taliban regime in neighboring Afghanistan and helped round up al-Qaeda militants and the Taliban tribesmen who helped them.
But his path to power -- through a coup in 1999 -- always seemed at odds with Bush's agenda to spread democracy. And some critics have questioned the depth of Musharraf's recent commitment to hunting down militants and pressing the search for Osama bin Laden. Since Sept. 11, the US has given Pakistan some US$10 billion in aid, most of it for the military.
Musharraf is extremely unpopular in his own country, even after he relinquished his rank of army general last year and retired from the military. That unpopularity has stoked anti-US feeling and threatens to erode Pakistan's cooperation in fighting terrorism.
Rick Barton, a Pakistan expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the role Musharraf will now play is an open question.
Should Musharraf voluntarily relinquish power, "it could lead to a peaceful transition and would signal the country has moved into another stage of political development," he said.
If he hangs on defiantly, it could "essentially stalemate the system," he said.
It is not clear just who Pakistan's next leaders will be -- or whether the new parliament could force Musharraf out.
The parties of slain former prime minister Benazir Bhutto and former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, the leader Musharraf ousted, won enough seats to form a new government, though they will likely fall short of the two-thirds needed to impeach the president.
Sharif on Tuesday called again for Musharraf to step down. Musharraf spokesman Rashid Qureshi said, however, that the president intends to work with the new government and will serve out his term, which expires in 2012.
Though he was unclear what that new government will look like, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said Musharraf's party is not the only potential partner.
Bhutto's party, in particular, "feels acutely the threat from violent extremists and terrorism, having had their party leader recently assassinated," McCormack said.
Michael O'Hanlon, a foreign policy expert at the Brookings Institution, said the shake-up in Pakistan's government "could be one of those counterintuitive things where someone who seems less hardline and pro-Western, who is a little less to our liking, may end up doing a better job" in rounding up terrorists. "I wouldn't rule that possibility out at all."
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS