President Chen Shui-bian's (
If only this trio had been employed in 2000, Taiwan's attempt to distance itself from China to achieve a global perspective would have produced impressive results.
Unfortunately, they entered the stage too late and have yet to unleash their full potential. Otherwise, the normalization of Taiwan's education and the formation of a more balanced media atmosphere would be nothing like it is today.
If the economic field were graced with a similar trio promoting the economy, combined with the hard work and wisdom of the Taiwanese people, Taiwan's economy could have been top in Asia and the pan-green camp would have had a chance to sweep both the legislative and presidential elections.
The same applies to foreign affairs. A few days ago, I read a report which in essence said that since Taiwan's de facto ambassador to Washington, Joseph Wu (吳釗燮), took up his position nine months ago, he has given 80 speeches and 69 interviews across the US, but although the US outside Washington has increased its knowledge of and sympathy for Taiwan, the Bush government continues to criticize its "provocative" UN referendums. Just after assuming his position, Wu entertained an unprecedented five South Pacific heads of state and prime ministers at Twin Oaks Garden in one evening. Americans familiar with Wu give him the thumbs up. If the DPP loses the March 22 election, he will be forced to leave Washington.
Why is Wu unable to persuade the Bush government to change its opposition to the referendums? The complex reasons of course include international circumstances and the rise of China, but most important is the fact that pan-blue individuals opposed to Taiwan's UN membership have been posted in Washington for the last seven years.
This can clearly not be remedied in just nine months. Just as the DPP's seven year rule has been severely affected by the pro-China media, the Bush administration has been misled by a false image of the DPP government that was propagated by pan-blue representatives in Washington. This cannot be altered in a short time. If the DPP government had stationed a pan-green representative in Washington in 2000, the situation could be different. Looking at the US founding principles and its long-term interests, it should not be opposed to Taiwan's democratic development and exercise of civil rights in the form of referendums.
To help millions of Taiwanese businesspeople in China to return for the presidential election on March 22, some commercial airlines may be offering 40 percent discounts on tickets. This has been a source of tension for the DPP, which is accusing China of vote buying. But why are there millions of Taiwanese businesspeople in China in the first place? We can only regret that there were no "three new economic treasures" in 2000.
Let us pray that the "three new treasures" and Wu enjoy prosperous successive terms -- and that three new economic treasures will appear soon to lead Taiwan away from China and into the West.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser.
Translated by Angela Hong
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry