President Chen Shui-bian's (
If only this trio had been employed in 2000, Taiwan's attempt to distance itself from China to achieve a global perspective would have produced impressive results.
Unfortunately, they entered the stage too late and have yet to unleash their full potential. Otherwise, the normalization of Taiwan's education and the formation of a more balanced media atmosphere would be nothing like it is today.
If the economic field were graced with a similar trio promoting the economy, combined with the hard work and wisdom of the Taiwanese people, Taiwan's economy could have been top in Asia and the pan-green camp would have had a chance to sweep both the legislative and presidential elections.
The same applies to foreign affairs. A few days ago, I read a report which in essence said that since Taiwan's de facto ambassador to Washington, Joseph Wu (吳釗燮), took up his position nine months ago, he has given 80 speeches and 69 interviews across the US, but although the US outside Washington has increased its knowledge of and sympathy for Taiwan, the Bush government continues to criticize its "provocative" UN referendums. Just after assuming his position, Wu entertained an unprecedented five South Pacific heads of state and prime ministers at Twin Oaks Garden in one evening. Americans familiar with Wu give him the thumbs up. If the DPP loses the March 22 election, he will be forced to leave Washington.
Why is Wu unable to persuade the Bush government to change its opposition to the referendums? The complex reasons of course include international circumstances and the rise of China, but most important is the fact that pan-blue individuals opposed to Taiwan's UN membership have been posted in Washington for the last seven years.
This can clearly not be remedied in just nine months. Just as the DPP's seven year rule has been severely affected by the pro-China media, the Bush administration has been misled by a false image of the DPP government that was propagated by pan-blue representatives in Washington. This cannot be altered in a short time. If the DPP government had stationed a pan-green representative in Washington in 2000, the situation could be different. Looking at the US founding principles and its long-term interests, it should not be opposed to Taiwan's democratic development and exercise of civil rights in the form of referendums.
To help millions of Taiwanese businesspeople in China to return for the presidential election on March 22, some commercial airlines may be offering 40 percent discounts on tickets. This has been a source of tension for the DPP, which is accusing China of vote buying. But why are there millions of Taiwanese businesspeople in China in the first place? We can only regret that there were no "three new economic treasures" in 2000.
Let us pray that the "three new treasures" and Wu enjoy prosperous successive terms -- and that three new economic treasures will appear soon to lead Taiwan away from China and into the West.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser.
Translated by Angela Hong
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS