Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and Ma Ying-jeou have been nominated as presidential candidates by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) respectively. They have registered as presidential candidates and the election is less than seven weeks away. Voters are eagerly examining their past performance as mayors and their campaign pledges. It's time to hold TV debates so that voters can make a good choice in the election.
Hsieh has invited Ma to have open debates several times. If Ma does not accept Hsieh's invitations, Ma's integrity and leadership will be doubted by voters. His popularity may be sacrificed in the election.
Does he have anything to hide? Is he a Harvard man who cannot debate? If Ma is afraid of Hsieh, how can Ma stand up in front of Chinese President Hu Jintao (
TV debates have become a routine process for presidential elections in democratic countries since the Kennedy-Nixon debate in the US in 1960. Taiwan should follow suit.
The topics of the TV debates could include topics such as the economy, Taiwan-China-US relations, China's missiles, party assets, the prevention of corruption, application for entry to the UN as "Taiwan" versus an application for re-entry as the ROC, referendums combined with or separated from the presidential election, independent sovereignty versus ultimate unification, national normalization and so on.
Hsieh and Ma should have two TV debates, and their running mates, Su and Siew, should have one TV debate.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether