Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and Ma Ying-jeou have been nominated as presidential candidates by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) respectively. They have registered as presidential candidates and the election is less than seven weeks away. Voters are eagerly examining their past performance as mayors and their campaign pledges. It's time to hold TV debates so that voters can make a good choice in the election.
Hsieh has invited Ma to have open debates several times. If Ma does not accept Hsieh's invitations, Ma's integrity and leadership will be doubted by voters. His popularity may be sacrificed in the election.
Does he have anything to hide? Is he a Harvard man who cannot debate? If Ma is afraid of Hsieh, how can Ma stand up in front of Chinese President Hu Jintao (
TV debates have become a routine process for presidential elections in democratic countries since the Kennedy-Nixon debate in the US in 1960. Taiwan should follow suit.
The topics of the TV debates could include topics such as the economy, Taiwan-China-US relations, China's missiles, party assets, the prevention of corruption, application for entry to the UN as "Taiwan" versus an application for re-entry as the ROC, referendums combined with or separated from the presidential election, independent sovereignty versus ultimate unification, national normalization and so on.
Hsieh and Ma should have two TV debates, and their running mates, Su and Siew, should have one TV debate.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under