"Integrity is honesty in action" is an aphorism Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential hopeful Ma Ying-jeou (
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
After Hsieh claimed the next day that he knew Ma's green card number, Ma called an emergency press conference later that night and said he did obtain a green card in 1977 to facilitate his application for student loans and for employment purposes. Ma said that both his and his wife's green cards were invalidated in the mid-1980s when they applied for visas at the American Institute in Taiwan to travel to the US.
Whether Ma is still a holder of a valid green card as the Hsieh camp alleges remains to be seen, but that's beside the point.
What is relevant is how Ma responds to such enquiries and what kind of crisis management skills he has for issues of genuine importance.
When first confronted by Hsieh with the green card question, Ma resorted to a rhetorical game of half-truths.
Telling a half-truth -- and then admitting it -- suggests Ma can all too easily turn an easy yes-or-no question into a snowballing headache.
If Ma had simply said that he once possessed a green card, then the matter would have ended there.
The way Ma has been coping with potential crises lately elicits deja vu.
Back in late 2006, when Ma was faced with accusations of embezzling his special allowance fund during his stint as Taipei mayor from 1998 to 2006, he said he was scrupulous in separating public funds from private interests.
It was only after he was indicted for embezzlement that he changed his statement, arguing that he understood the special allowance fund was a "substantial subsidy" that formed part of his official income.
Long a darling of the press, Ma has been able to maintain a clean-cut image through sophisticated image manipulation. As a result, it often seems like Hsieh is running against a pop idol rather than a presidential candidate.
As a democratic country, Taiwan no longer needs an idol to worship as it did under the KMT's authoritarian regime.
It is time to scrutinize Ma for the integrity and leadership skills needed to lead the country.
What Taiwan wants is a candidate with integrity to win the election on March 22 -- not celebrities who crack under precious little pressure.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS