"Integrity is honesty in action" is an aphorism Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential hopeful Ma Ying-jeou (
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
After Hsieh claimed the next day that he knew Ma's green card number, Ma called an emergency press conference later that night and said he did obtain a green card in 1977 to facilitate his application for student loans and for employment purposes. Ma said that both his and his wife's green cards were invalidated in the mid-1980s when they applied for visas at the American Institute in Taiwan to travel to the US.
Whether Ma is still a holder of a valid green card as the Hsieh camp alleges remains to be seen, but that's beside the point.
What is relevant is how Ma responds to such enquiries and what kind of crisis management skills he has for issues of genuine importance.
When first confronted by Hsieh with the green card question, Ma resorted to a rhetorical game of half-truths.
Telling a half-truth -- and then admitting it -- suggests Ma can all too easily turn an easy yes-or-no question into a snowballing headache.
If Ma had simply said that he once possessed a green card, then the matter would have ended there.
The way Ma has been coping with potential crises lately elicits deja vu.
Back in late 2006, when Ma was faced with accusations of embezzling his special allowance fund during his stint as Taipei mayor from 1998 to 2006, he said he was scrupulous in separating public funds from private interests.
It was only after he was indicted for embezzlement that he changed his statement, arguing that he understood the special allowance fund was a "substantial subsidy" that formed part of his official income.
Long a darling of the press, Ma has been able to maintain a clean-cut image through sophisticated image manipulation. As a result, it often seems like Hsieh is running against a pop idol rather than a presidential candidate.
As a democratic country, Taiwan no longer needs an idol to worship as it did under the KMT's authoritarian regime.
It is time to scrutinize Ma for the integrity and leadership skills needed to lead the country.
What Taiwan wants is a candidate with integrity to win the election on March 22 -- not celebrities who crack under precious little pressure.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
RSS