More than 80 percent of the residents of Taiwan want this country to be a member of the UN. As both of you have recognized in the past, this country is a sovereign nation.
According to international law, the best definition of a sovereign nation appears in the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States signed in Uruguay on Dec. 26, 1933. According to this treaty, a sovereign state has four characteristics: a permanent population; a defined territory; government; and capacity to enter into relations with other states. Taiwan clearly has all four of these characteristics. In addition, the people of Taiwan freely and democratically elect the nation's government.
This clear unity among the people of this nation in desiring to participate in the UN has been lost in partisan bickering. I urge you both to put aside partisan interests and to concentrate on national interests.
To demonstrate to the world the desire of the Taiwanese to belong to the UN, I would urge a three-point agreement that you:
* Put aside the issue of "name" and do not refer to "Taiwan" or the "Republic of China." Instead, you can refer to "this country."
* Put aside the issue of whether this country shall "join the UN" or "return to the UN." Rather, you can refer to "participating in the UN."
* Urge all voters to support both UN referendums in the March 22 election.
With both of you supporting the two referendums, it is highly likely that they will pass. This will send an important message to the world that this nation is a sovereign nation that both wants and deserves to be a member of the UN. Failing to pass the referendums would send exactly the wrong message.
Such an agreement would also go a long way toward diminishing political division in Taiwan and help to forge a new national unity.
Professor Bruce Jacobs,
Taiwan Research Unit,
Monash University
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,