Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (
But further investigation into the circumstances in which the comments were made also help to discredit election promises made by Ma and his party to Aboriginal people.
The Aborigines of Sijhou Community (
Community leaders pleaded with the KMT's standard bearer after the Taipei County Government gave villagers until the end of the year to vacate the area -- for their own safety, they were told, because their houses are situated on a flood plain.
However, community leaders suspect the real reason behind the KMT-controlled county government's move is that a vast swath of the river bank has been earmarked for a 4.65km-long riverside park stretching from Hsiulang Bridge (
The Aboriginal community has been offered, as compensation, an "apartment complex constructed especially for Aborigines" where they will enjoy reduced rent. But leaders are worried that this will have a devastating effect on their traditionally communal lifestyle.
The Aborigines' concerns seem to have fallen on deaf ears with both the county government and Ma, despite their loyal support for the KMT at election time.
They are not alone, as the owners of small businesses and coffee shops in Bitan face a similar fate. They were ordered to pack up and leave when the county government decided to make the renovation of the popular riverside spot part of its plans.
Many of the traders, who have worked on the site for decades, are unhappy.
They say it will be difficult to afford to stay in the area when work is complete. They fear the government's plans to make the area more "upmarket" will squeeze out small businesses in favor of chain stores and larger operators.
Herein lies Ma's problem.
The KMT, in its bid to win back power, has spent countless hours and millions of dollars to ensure the legislative and presidential election campaigns remain focused on the only thing that the KMT can be proud of from its decades of authoritarian rule: improvements to the economy and standard of living.
The party's election message has been all about how it intends to stick up for the "little guy" in the face of the growing threat posed by the global economy. However, the reality in Sindian and many other locations in recent years paints an entirely different picture.
Put aside the faux concern for the common man, the donning of a farmer's hat and the blue plastic flip-flops, and the message to the stallholders of Bitan, the lepers of Losheng Sanatorium, the artists and residents of Treasure Hill (
Roughly translated, this means: If you stand between the KMT and the path of development, your livelihood isn't so important after all.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS