In the past few months, several heads of state have received the Dalai Lama and indirect exchanges between Beijing and the religious leader have focused more attention on Tibet than it has seen for years. The [for Beijing] unwelcome attention has incensed Chinese authorities and sparked a nonstop flow of propagandist denunciations and threats that have done little more than erode the country's credibility abroad at a time when everything from child labor money-making schemes at public schools to toys laced with lead have severely tarnished its reputation.
China's invective against a man who has won the Nobel Peace Prize and advocates peaceful dialogue can only fail miserably, but Beijing has displayed a distinct lack of strategic deftness in handling the matter, doing itself the disservice of repeatedly stirring up the issue.
On Nov. 28, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesman Liu Jianchao (
Again, China would have been better off keeping quiet. Its comment only highlighted blatant contradictions in its actions and again landed its "Measures on the Management of the Reincarnation of the Living Buddhas of Tibetan Buddhism" in international news. The measures, passed this summer, stipulate that the Chinese government has sole authority in selecting the reincarnations that are central to the religion.
A week later, the Dalai Lama proposed holding a referendum -- including Tibetans in China -- over the issue of his next incarnation. But China, which calls itself "the people's democratic dictatorship" in its Constitution, quickly made it clear it would never allow a plebiscite.
Beijing has yet to understand that its rhetoric doesn't have the same effect in democratic countries as it does with Chinese who have been force-fed a skewed view of reality from grade school on. Instead, Beijing is fueling a public opinion abroad that is a mirror opposite of the image it wants to promote.
But perhaps China believes its rhetoric to be effective. After all, many people in the West incorrectly believe the Dalai Lama demands independence for Tibet -- a claim China repeatedly makes. That widespread misunderstanding, however, probably has less to do with the efficacy of Beijing's propaganda overseas and more to do with the frequent news of abuses in Tibet. Only two weeks ago, hundreds of Tibetans clashed with authorities after police reportedly brutally beat three young monks, one of whom, a 14-year-old, was caught wearing a photo of the Dalai Lama around his neck. For those of us who value democracy and human rights, it is hard to believe Tibetans would want anything less than full independence.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS