The recent flap over President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) speculation that he might resort to martial law to force the KMT to follow election regulations highlighted the error made by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) when Chen assumed the chairmanship of the party. Not only is Chen attempting to do too much, but last time he was both chair and president, the DPP's election effort was less than stellar. Fortunately, with that foolish remark, Chen has now given the DPP an opportunity to redeem that error.
In recent weeks Chen and DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) have been playing a game wherein Chen makes radical remarks that permit Frank Hsieh to appear as the more moderate of the two.
The media then dutifully announces a split between the two, and followed by a denial by the two that there's a split.
In addition to making Hsieh look moderate, this tactic has also had the advantage of making the KMT focus their campaign on the lame duck Chen instead of the future president Hsieh. This behavior, however rewarding, puts the campaign at risk as everything depends on Chen exercising restraint in his role as "radical." Because he is both president and chairman of the party, every word that comes from his lips carries enormous weight, making it inevitable that he would appear to cross the line at some point.
Clearly the words "martial law" should never have come from Chen's mouth, but now that they have, the DPP should salvage something positive from the mess by forcing Chen to do the right thing: resign.
Chen should step down from his post as party chair, and hand it over to someone, preferably a professional, who has only one thing on her mind: getting DPP candidates elected.
Chen and Hsieh will still be able to play serve and volley in the local media, and Chen will still grip the KMT's attention, but he will no longer put the election at risk every time he opens his mouth.
Michael Turton
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with