One could almost smell the irony last Friday when several members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), smarting at confirmation of the party's defeat in last December's Kaohsiung mayoral election, accused the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and its candidate, Chen Chu (
After all, it was supporters of KMT candidate Huang Chun-ying (
Those with short memories may also have forgotten that the KMT profited from making identical accusations during the 2005 campaign that saw Chou Hsi-wei (
Yet the KMT continued to cast Chen as the villain in this particular drama, even going so far as to accuse her of interfering with the judiciary. One could put the accusations down to sour grapes, except that this ridiculous behavior has gone on for seven years, ever since the KMT lost the reins of executive power.
During this period -- if one is to believe its propaganda campaign -- the KMT has gone from being the richest political party in the world to a poverty-stricken organization that is struggling to make ends meet.
Party members who became ridiculously wealthy from a career in politics during the KMT's five decades of authoritarian rule can now apparently stand up guilt-free and proclaim the government "corrupt."
Of course, the endless stream of government officials indicted for filling their pockets has given credence to the KMT's claims, but do people seriously believe a party that has continuously blocked the corruption-busting "sunshine laws" in the legislature will reform a political system that runs on bribes and backhanders if it is returned to power?
The KMT has worked extremely hard to drag the DPP government down to its level in the public eye, labeling it with all the unwelcome titles it earned over the years in the hope this will help it come back into power.
This endless campaign has seemingly borne fruit. Despite broken promises of party reform, next year could well see the KMT win both legislative and executive power.
But peer through the veneer of respectability that presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Voters must not forget that a vote for the KMT is a vote for a party that continues to tolerate illegal and thuggish behavior -- as evidenced by the "hero's welcome" given to legislator and convicted vandal Chiu Yi (
A vote for the KMT is a vote for a party that according to the Taiwan News plans to employ 50,000 "election monitors" on Jan. 12 to intimidate voters into "forgetting about" the referendum on its stolen assets.
It is a vote for a party that during the last seven years has unreasonably blocked the government from passing countless laws advocating reform and has implemented a shady deal with the Chinese Communist Party that has harmed the nation's defenses and subverted its hard-won democracy.
Voters must keep the bigger picture in mind as they walk to the polling stations next spring, otherwise they may one day look back and realize they fell for one of the biggest "dirty trick" campaigns in history.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath