Former US vice president Al Gore and the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) sharing this year's Nobel Peace Prize underscores the fact that global warming is the primary issue affecting all of mankind in the 21st century -- and that this is something governments, enterprises and the public must take seriously.
Although we know how serious global warming is, we aren't doing anything substantial to remedy the situation.
We make up excuses and prioritize economic growth. China is especially fond of using the economy as an excuse.
But Taiwan is no exception. Although our population makes up only 0.34 percent of the global population, we are responsible for 1 percent of the world's carbon-dioxide emissions. Over the past decade, the nation's per capita carbon-dioxide emissions have increased steadily by 5.6 percent.
The nation emits around 11 tonnes of carbon dioxide per person per year -- as much as the member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) -- and yet its GDP is lower. It is true that Taiwan's GDP has increased gradually in recent years, but energy productivity -- production per liter of oil -- remains unchanged. In other words, the economic growth rate is closely linked to energy consumption and carbon-dioxide emissions.
This poses a dilemma: It would seem that further economic development will inevitably mean more greenhouse gases.
The OECD member countries have been making efforts to combat the link between GDP and carbon-dioxide emissions. Before 1999, the OECD countries' GDPs and carbon-dioxide emissions were increasing at the same rate. However, since 2000, their carbon-dioxide emissions have remained virtually unchanged, while their GDPs have continued to increase.
The most obvious example is Denmark, where GDP grew by 20 percent with almost no changes in energy consumption between 1995 and 2005, and its carbon-dioxide emissions dropped almost 20 percent. This is the most successful example of cutting GDP growth from carbon-dioxide emissions.
Denmark has made crucial adjustments to its industries, sparing no effort to promote non-carbon industries, including financial, service, creative and cultural industries.
In addition, it has greatly expanded its use of renewable energy. Denmark hopes to raise the use of renewable energy from 15 percent to 25 percent by 2025, mainly with bioenergy.
Taiwan has also been working hard in this direction, installing a number of wind-power facilities, but only managing to increase the proportion of renewable energy used by less than 1 percent. What's more, since our wind-power generators have all been imported from other countries and cost a lot of money, it hasn't contributed much to domestic economic growth. In addition, the high cost of producing renewable energy means that the government has had to subsidize it.
Only by developing local manufacturing processes, products and equipment that help reduce carbon-dioxide emissions can we delink GDP growth from emissions. Examples are energy-efficient heat insulation materials and power-generating biogas facilities.
Still, Taiwan must keep in mind that spending a few hundred million NT dollars on a couple of wind-power generators may generate more electricity than the biogas produced by a sewage water plant, but that doesn't mean the nation should neglect investing in better sewage water plants. The nation must carefully weight its strategy.
Chen Wen-ching is a research fellow at the Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Translated by Ted Yang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with