In today's economy, corporations freely roam the globe for the most efficient, lowest-cost sources of supplies and labor, while US workers are told that the way to compete is constantly to improve their skills with training and education.
Paying for it is usually up to beleaguered employees, which only adds to their sense of economic insecurity.
IBM, often a trendsetter in business practices, is taking a step to address the workers' economic problem -- a step it hopes other companies will follow and help encourage a change in tax policy.
At a conference in Washington on Wednesday, IBM announced it would begin offering its employees in the US specialized savings accounts for training and education. The "learning accounts" will be modeled on 401(k) retirement accounts, which began in the late 1970s.
Workers will put up to US$1,000 a year into the accounts and IBM will contribute US$0.50 for every dollar put in by the employee. Under the IBM plan, the employee decides how and when to spend the money, held in an interest-bearing account. When an employee leaves IBM, the individual takes the account along with a 401(k) retirement account.
Companies have long paid for employee education and training. Indeed, IBM spends more than US$600 million a year on worker education programs.
Yet such spending is typically to upgrade a person's skills for their next job with the company.
"This is truly path-breaking," said Rosabeth Moss Kanter, a professor at the Harvard business school. "The significance is that it's controlled by the individual. I'm not aware of any other major corporation doing that, as opposed to programs that are part of some career scheme that the company has in mind."
The IBM move, Kanter said, is part of a broader evolution in corporate-worker relations.
"This is reinventing how a company develops the social contract with its workers in a highly mobile, global economy," she said.
A key message in that new social contract, IBM executives said, is that whether a person stays with the company for a long career or just for a few years, IBM is a place where people can enhance their skills and be more competitive in a labor market buffeted by globalization and rapid technological change.
corporate climate
Investing to create that kind of corporate climate, IBM says, should eventually give the company an edge in attracting and retaining talented workers. In an interview, Samuel Palmisano, the chief executive, emphasized that the program was inspired in part by corporate self-interest, adding that "IBM will be more competitive."
Palmisano pushed for the learning accounts and the 401(k)-style arrangement, which he said recognized the "dual set of responsibilities in today's world" of both the individual and the corporation. "It puts the right balance of motivation into the system," he said.
"Everyone has some skin in the game," he said.
Besides encouraging other corporations, IBM plans to talk with universities, urging them to consider tuition discounts for workers seeking new skills.
A tax change is needed, IBM and some economists say, to help workers to invest in their own education in new fields. At present, workers can deduct the cost of education and training in their own occupation, as defined by government job classifications, but not in new careers.
For example, if a software engineer wanted to learn a new programming language, the training costs would be tax deductible. But if that person wanted to train to be a business consultant, that would generally not be tax deductible, even though the new job required related technology and skills. If the programmer wanted to become an emergency room nurse, the education expense would not be tax deductible because it is a different line of work.
Palmisano would also prefer the law to be changed to allow the new accounts to use pretax dollars, as a 401(k) does.
IBM is by no means alone in pushing for tax change. A policy paper last month by three academics -- Grant Aldonas of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Robert Lawrence of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government and Matthew Slaughter of the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth -- recommended, among other measures, that Congress approve full deductibility for training expenses by individuals, "even when directed at preparation for an entirely new career."
The report, Succeeding in the Global Economy: A New Policy Agenda for the American Worker was sponsored by the Financial Services Forum, an organization of chief executives of the largest commercial banks, investment banks and insurers.
The IBM move, said Slaughter, an economist and a former member of the Council of Economic Advisers in the George W. Bush administration, is "precisely the kind of policy we'd like to see throughout the economy."
Many policy groups have recommendations to increase the opportunities for workers to upgrade their skills continually. Last month, for example, the Third Way, a research organization aligned with centrist Democrats, called for the federal student loan program to be extended to adults seeking new skills to climb the occupational ladder.
The IBM learning accounts fit into the larger policy debate about how to cope with an economy of increasing dynamism but one that creates a lot of churn in the labor market. Four million jobs a month, or 25,000 an hour in a business day, are eliminated in the US economy. But more than that are created.
forward-thinking
IBM, a classic global enterprise, deals with plenty of job churn itself as its worldwide employment has increased in recent years, US employment has declined slightly, with steady hiring and layoffs. In the second quarter of this year, 3,500 IBM workers worldwide were told their jobs were being eliminated. A third of the displaced employees typically find jobs elsewhere in the company.
Steps like the IBM learning accounts could well help some people make transitions to new jobs, but they will do little for many workers, said Jared Bernstein, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal research group.
"This is a pretty forward-thinking move, but it's wrong to think that you can always train your way out of the box that globalization puts many of these workers in," Bernstein said. "That larger problem is where the federal government ought to be."
IBM's learning accounts will initially be available next year to workers who have been with the company for at least five years in the US, where the company employed 127,000 people at the end of last year.
The company has earmarked US$40 million over the three years for contributions to the learning accounts, which is in addition to its US$600 million training budget. And US$20 million will be spent on two other new programs -- one to send employees to developing countries to work on environmental and educational projects and the other to train mainly retirees in their 50s who want second careers in nonprofit organizations, government and schools.
Palmisano is to announce the programs at a two-day conference on US competitiveness in a global economy, jointly sponsored by the Department of Commerce, the US Chamber of Commerce, the Peterson Institute for International Economics and IBM.
IBM would like to extend the learning accounts -- or some version of them -- internationally, Palmisano said. He said the US is the logical starting place to learn from early efforts and try to attract a following.
"We'll pilot it and we'll see what kind of reaction we get," he said.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS