At an international food safety conference in Beijing in May, EU Director-General for Health and Consumer Protection Robert Madelin argued that Chinese food products are of dubious quality, putting the health of consumers at risk.
Last week, a US couple filed a lawsuit with the Indiana state court against a food manufacturer, Robert's American Gourmet, after their one-year-old son died of severe diarrhea three days after eating the company's Veggie Booty snacks. The hospital diagnosed him with salmonella poisoning. As a result, the company was forced to recall Veggie Booty and Super Veggie Tings, which both contained the same additives imported from China. The additives tested positive for salmonella.
In light of contaminated Chinese food and ingredients, Food for Health International, a US health food company, has already launched a "China-free" campaign. The company says in its advertisements that its products do not contain any ingredients from China and has begun labeling its packages with a "China-free" sticker.
The Food and Drug Administration requires that seafood companies specify the origin of the food on packages, while meat and agricultural products must meet similar regulations. Although the US industry, government and academics have actively discussed how to improve food labeling, the "China-free" stickers are the first concrete sign of change.
As for Taiwan, the clearest example of labeling is Taiwan Salt Industrial Corp's "Contains Taiwan salt" certification label. To distinguish its products from Chinese ones, the company has used a Taiwan-shaped label on its packaging so as to reassure consumers that foods and restaurants with the label are using its salts.
We must be more aware of where our food comes from. At the hospital where I work, the head of the nutrition department once told me that she never bought any imported Chinese foods and always paid careful attention to food safety. There has not been a case of food poisoning at the hospital in more than 10 years, which puts patients and colleagues well at ease.
Janice Chen is an administrative member of the Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS