At an international food safety conference in Beijing in May, EU Director-General for Health and Consumer Protection Robert Madelin argued that Chinese food products are of dubious quality, putting the health of consumers at risk.
Last week, a US couple filed a lawsuit with the Indiana state court against a food manufacturer, Robert's American Gourmet, after their one-year-old son died of severe diarrhea three days after eating the company's Veggie Booty snacks. The hospital diagnosed him with salmonella poisoning. As a result, the company was forced to recall Veggie Booty and Super Veggie Tings, which both contained the same additives imported from China. The additives tested positive for salmonella.
In light of contaminated Chinese food and ingredients, Food for Health International, a US health food company, has already launched a "China-free" campaign. The company says in its advertisements that its products do not contain any ingredients from China and has begun labeling its packages with a "China-free" sticker.
The Food and Drug Administration requires that seafood companies specify the origin of the food on packages, while meat and agricultural products must meet similar regulations. Although the US industry, government and academics have actively discussed how to improve food labeling, the "China-free" stickers are the first concrete sign of change.
As for Taiwan, the clearest example of labeling is Taiwan Salt Industrial Corp's "Contains Taiwan salt" certification label. To distinguish its products from Chinese ones, the company has used a Taiwan-shaped label on its packaging so as to reassure consumers that foods and restaurants with the label are using its salts.
We must be more aware of where our food comes from. At the hospital where I work, the head of the nutrition department once told me that she never bought any imported Chinese foods and always paid careful attention to food safety. There has not been a case of food poisoning at the hospital in more than 10 years, which puts patients and colleagues well at ease.
Janice Chen is an administrative member of the Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers