He is not as well known as former US vice president Al Gore, but among green campaigners, no one has a bigger role in tackling climate change than Ma Jun (
Ma, 39, has emerged as the powerful voice of a budding green movement that is forcing industry and China's tightly run state to be more accountable for the long-term consequences of their rush to get rich.
He founded the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, which is among those leading the charge to clean up the air and rivers of China, a monumental task. Pollution is leaking beyond its borders. Sand storms caused by desertification blast across the Korea Peninsula and Japan all the way over the Pacific to the US. And as the dump for 50 billion tonnes of effluent annually, the rivers' toxic discharges threaten marine life hundreds of miles beyond China's seas.
The country's environmental importance was apparent last month when US President George W. Bush said he would not sign up to ambitious new goals to prevent global warming unless China was involved. Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Ma has cause for optimism. The former journalist switched to activism in 1997 after hearing Chinese hydro-engineers boast that the Yellow River was a model of water management, even though it was so over-dammed and exploited that it failed to reach the sea on more than 200 days each year. That inspired Ma to write an influential book warning of an impending crisis.
There was not much an ordinary citizen could do then, when green campaigners were considered a threat to a government fixated with economic growth regardless of the environmental cost. But much has changed. Since 2003, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
Ma's institute's online China Water Pollution Map -- www.ipe.org.cn -- names and shames the worst offending regions and companies. It is a symbol of a new kind of social activism in China: pragmatic rather than idealistic, and relying more on maps and data than votes and speeches to lobby for change.
If polluting companies want their names removed from the map they have to accept an environmental audit from a third party and act on any problems. This has prompted a response by 30 companies, mostly multinationals. Six have already agreed to audits. Among them, Panasonic Battery in Shanghai which is refitting its factory's water system.
"It is not just because of us," Ma said. "But it is really good. They sent a big delegation to our office to explain their actions and they have invited us to go and check their plant."
Not everyone is as receptive. Ma says Pepsi, General Motors and five or six British firms are among those who have not responded. There are 80 multinationals among the 5,500 violators listed, but they face the fiercest criticism.
Ma is unapologetic.
"Multinationals are more sensitive to public pressure because they have bigger brand names and they have made commitments to be environmentally sensitive. Chinese firms are not used to this kind of pressure yet," he said.
To make domestic firms feel the heat, he plans to target their overseas buyers and suppliers.
"Globalized manufacturing and procurement mean that a lot of high-polluting, heavy duty jobs are transferred to China," Ma said. "We will ask major companies, such as Wal-Mart, Microsoft and IBM to put pressure on their Chinese suppliers."
New laws have been implemented on environmental protection in China and the latest five-year plan includes ambitious targets to cut pollution by 10 percent and improve energy efficiency by 20 percent. But these fine-sounding directives run up against resistance by local authorities still focused on rapid development, and fear from companies that environmental concerns will drive them out of business.
"Managers from one big Chinese noodle company came here and told me, `We are just a farmers' company. Think how it will impact on us.' But I tell them the rules are made by the government. Every firm should comply. It doesn't mean they can't compete," Ma said.
So how does it feel for the head of a small campaign to have executives from some of the world's biggest companies knocking at his door to explain themselves?
"It shows that China has bottlenecks. Environmental problems cannot be resolved here the way they are resolved in other countries. I heard that 80 percent of the environmental problems in the US are solved in court. That can't happen here," Ma said.
These "bottlenecks" are the one-party state with no independent justice system, no political accountability and no free media. For decades, there was nothing to stop Chinese Communist Party cadres and factory bosses from pumping out poisons.
However, the market economy has given consumers more choice, the media have greater freedom and businesses are gradually paying attention to corporate social responsibility.
"This is a lucky time for us because central government leaders have changed their mindset," Ma said. "We have a vibrant economy. There is over-supply of goods. That means strong competition and more consumer power."
His next project is an air quality map. There is still no comprehensive data for carbon emissions despite China's G8 promise of significant achievements in this area. Ma says China needs time to come to terms with climate change. His goal is to ensure China's natural heritage is not destroyed by economic growth.
"China is moving forward. Developing countries are not the real culprits. Rich countries must take responsibility," he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under