The drumbeat of disaster that heralds global warming quickened its tempo this week; some parts of Britain had a sixth of their annual rainfall in 12 hours -- some statistic.
It has all been foreseen, and for far too long. After the country's Met Office first briefed former prime minister Margaret Thatcher on climate change 17 years ago, she predicted: "There would surely be a great migration of population away from areas of the world liable to flooding."
Just over a year later, the Yangtze threw 10 million Chinese from their homes.
In 1993, after the worst American floods in memory, cornfields across nine states were under water that covered farm buildings.
In 1995 the Rhine rose 17m above sea level, forcing a quarter of a million people in the Netherlands to evacuate, and the Oder spread a "once in a thousand years" flood across tracts of Poland, the Czech Republic and eastern Germany.
Let me pause the historical playback at this point, more than a decade ago, to emphasize how long that drumbeat has been rolling.
Climate change is all about extremes.
The US cornfields of 1993 had a few years earlier been shrivelling in the worst drought in living memory.
The flood-prone Rhine nearly dried up in October 2003. You could wade across it in some places.
Consider what such escalating extremes of climate can do to national economies. The 1991 Yangtze floods submerged 20 percent of China's croplands.
The European drought of 2003 cut plant growth by 30 percent. Monday saw a state of emergency in north-west England, but in March 2000, floods turned the whole of Mozambique into a state of emergency, setting the national economy back by years.
The previous set of "once in a century" floods in the UK, in October 2000, helped bring an end to the so-called fuel crisis.
A handful of haulers, irate about fuel prices much lower than today's, had brought the country almost to its knees in just a few days, with a halfhearted blockade of a few oil refineries -- a perfect encapsulation of the vulnerability of modern economies.
A cartoonist of the day caught the moment: the truckers carry their self-interested placards, plowing through floodwater; from the stormclouds the hand of God reaches down clutching a large piece of paper labeled "the bill."
We know what we have to do: make deep cuts in emissions. A managed mass withdrawal from fossil fuels, no less. We have to mobilize as if for war, but the currency will be clean energy, not Spitfires, Lancasters and tanks.
A call went out in the UK to leaders from the energy industry and others to discuss this mobilization task last week.
The message was that together communities, businesses and governments could achieve deep cuts in emissions.
The task may have no historical precedent, but it is as feasible as it is imperative.
Mobilization will require effective leaders in all three of these sectors, however. A start has been made, although belatedly, in the past six months.
In the communities sector the progressive cities lead, with their use of planning powers, among other tools.
In business the major retailers lead, with their various strategies to go low carbon. In government Sweden leads, with its plan to get out of oil within 15 years.
The UK has been a leader in rhetoric, under former prime minister Tony Blair, not policy. Former US president Al Gore said new British Prime Minister Gordon Brown faced a unique moment in history. Left unsaid was the failure of his predecessor.
Clear as day was the gauntlet thrown down for Brown.
And so we wait to see what the first days of the new regime will bring. Behind the gathering clouds the hand of God is busy, writing more bills.
Jeremy Leggett served on the UK government's Renewables Advisory Board from 2002 to last year.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS