When a government-run brick plant in Hongdong County of Shanxi Province was revealed to be using slave labor, a famous scene from a Beijing opera flashed through my mind. In that opera, a prostitute named Su San, after being sentenced to death, pleads for mercy to unconcerned passersby as she is marched down the main roads of Hongdong County in shackles.
As I browse the Web site of the county government, there is no mention of slave labor or child workers at its brick factory. All you can find are newsreaders from national television covering the smiling faces of people who have come back to Hongdong to seek their roots and pay homage to their ancestors. There are also reports of visits by high officials to Hongdong.
Indeed, were it not for the 400 fathers who petitioned for the rescue of their kidnapped children who had been sold into slavery, Hongdong County would still just be a tourism hot spot for Chinese people seeking their roots. As a result of the slave-labor brick plants, as well as reports of an eight-year-old child worker being buried alive and migrant workers killed, Hongdong's name has become infamous.
Yet despite the scandal, migrant workers and children in school uniforms are still being abducted across the country and pushed into monstrous brick plants and coalmines. Girls are forced into prostitution at a mere US$5 a session.
The 400 fathers of the enslaved children, of course, are left to wonder about the human costs of President Hu Jintao's (胡錦濤) so-called "harmonious society." How many more children will become slaves in the maw of China's capitalist-communist system? Who is responsible when such crimes happen?
These men simply want their children back, but all the government is doing is watching the anxious fathers with suspicion. Moreover, these fathers are allowed to demand only their children, not compensation. After all, the brick factory bosses paid US$52 for each child, so their property rights are at stake.
Slavery is not confined to Hongdong's brick plants. There are such dark spots across the country. What makes matters worse is that the state authorities, particularly the police, patrol these slave operations to keep them running.
Four years ago, a college graduate named Sun Zhigang was arrested for walking on the streets of Guangzhou. He was beaten to death while in custody. This incident revealed the extent to which the police cooperated in turning ordinary people into slaves. Media coverage fueled a backlash of overwhelming public revulsion.
But change went only skin-deep. Human trafficking was transferred from the police to job agencies and the Ministry of Labor Supervision. State officials themselves are among the worst human traffickers. And the grimmest statistic of all is that many child slaves who are rescued are resold by officials to another slave-labor plant.
Seven years ago, a lawmaker from Hunan Province went to Shanxi Province to rescue slave workers from brick plants. At that time, the rescued workers knelt down and wept. Fortunately, they were not beaten or buried alive for not showing up for their shift, as has happened to others.
Today, however, that legislator would not be able to rescue a single worker, because the local government and police have learned from past experience how to keep busybodies away. There are more than 1,000 brick plants and coalmines around China, and most are under the protection of corrupt officials.
Hu Wenhai, a brave man from Shanxi who killed two corrupt officials, said before his execution: "Officials are forcing people to rebel. I can't let these assholes squeeze people any more. I know I'm going to die, but my death will get the attention of those officials."
So, instead of China being convulsed with rage at news that children are being turned into slaves, the media are censored and the 400 parents of the Hongdong children are blacklisted by the government. They cannot leave their homes to find their children. It seems today that in China the daily work of the government is to keep people from protecting themselves and their families in an attempt to gloss over the crimes of a "harmonious society."
The socialism established by Mao Zedong (
Ma Jian is the author of Red Dust and The Noodlemaker.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS