Former premier and respected economic figure Vincent Siew (
Just exactly what Taiwan's economy needs saving from remains a mystery, but the cab driver -- like thousands of other people around the nation -- seems to believe the often-propagated myth that Taiwan's economy is in serious trouble.
But who can blame them when every day people are bombarded by opposition politicians and media outlets saying things are in such a terrible state. Sunday's Central Daily News online headline is a perfect example: "Ma-Siew ticket promises to lead Taiwan out of economic quagmire."
Repeating a falsehood 1,000 times, however, does not make it true.
Let's put the record straight: Taiwan's economy is not a basket case. Foreign investment in Taiwan remains strong; last year saw a total of 1,846 investment projects, worth US$13.97 billion, a year-on-year increase of 230.39 percent. The stock market, that other great indicator of success for economic experts in Taiwan, is at a seven-year high.
Unemployment, meanwhile, stood at 3.87 percent last month -- a figure comparable with or much lower than most rival economies.
Then look at the GDP, which according to Academia Sinica's latest estimates will grow by up to 4.46 percent this year. This figure is quite acceptable for developed economies like Taiwan, which will never be able to match China's runaway double-digit economic growth.
The opposition, meanwhile, with its talk of direct flights, abolition of the 40 percent investment cap and the three direct links, clearly sees China as a panacea for all of Taiwan's "woes."
But there is one thing these economic harbingers of doom never explain properly. Taiwan has already invested more in China than any other nation in the world, and yet according to them things here are so bad. How exactly then is further large-scale cross-strait investment going to make things better?
Relaxing restrictions on further investment in China will not benefit the nation's blue-collar workers or farmers -- those in Taiwan who are really struggling. Those people struggle because of the steadfast refusal of local companies to pay a decent wage -- as we saw with the recent battle to increase the minimum wage.
It is this and the large-scale flight of industry abroad that has put so many people in dire straits.
The only people who profit from spreading such economic pessimism are the opposition parties and their friends in Beijing who advocate eventual unification, and multinational companies who stand to reduce costs even further through direct transport and cargo links.
This is why the American Chamber of Commerce (Amcham) time and again comes out in support of relaxing restrictions, as it did in its 2007 Taiwan White Paper.
Amcham, in case people weren't aware, is an organization, to quote its Web site,"dedicated to promoting the interests of international business." It doesn't give a hoot about farmers, single mothers or downtrodden workers.
Taiwan's economy is not perfect, but it is not on the verge of meltdown as the opposition would like us to believe.
The only thing likely to improve people's lives in Taiwan is more investment in Taiwan, not China. And the sooner the cab drivers of Taiwan realize this and see through the opposition's illusion of an economic paradise across the Taiwan Strait the better.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath