Monday was the 18th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre. Eighteen years is a long time, but the countless people who witnessed it on the television can still clearly imagine those bloody scenes.
Yet in China, many people don't believe there was a massacre on June 4, 1989, and a lot of young people have no idea that anything occurred at Beijing's Tiananmen Square on that date.
Chinese studying abroad have written that it was only when they went overseas that they learned there had been a massacre.
It is hard to believe when we hear it, but this is the result of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) monopolizing the media, destroying evidence and fabricating history.
The Chinese government has been able to obliterate an incident that happened before people's eyes.
In this respect, the CCP and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) are like brothers.
In Taiwan's 228 Incident, the KMT government also used the military to massacre civilians, later destroyed evidence and monopolized the media to change history.
Not long ago, SET-TV aired a special program about the 228 Incident.
The program's use of footage from a Shanghai massacre by the KMT caused a lot of debate, but SET-TV used the material because they had no footage of the actual incident.
It has been reported that there are only three photographs of the 228 massacre in existence.
Pictures and documentaries about World War II are widely available because by that time photography and filming were widespread.
It is odd that of the 228 Incident, which happened after World War II, hardly a photograph can be found, let alone documentaries.
Common sense
Common sense tells us that if little record of the 228 Incident can be found, the KMT must have destroyed all evidence of it.
In the more than half a century that has followed, the KMT acted just like the CCP after the Tiananmen Square Massacre: It fabricated history in order to prevent Taiwanese from knowing what really happened.
A few months ago, the KMT got together to demonstrate, dress someone up as Chiang Kai-shek (
They don't see him as the culprit responsible for the 228 Incident at all.
Although the KMT has not been the ruling party for years and can't rule like autocrats anymore, its reliance on the use of party power to suppress dissenting voices and its attempts to influence the media have not changed.
Underground radio
A week ago, Ocean Voice Radio, which is devoted to Taiwan's normalization, was closed by the National Communications Commission (NCC) because it was an underground radio station.
Ocean Voice Radio responded by saying it had not intended to broadcast illegally and had applied for a license several times, only to be refused.
According to an estimate by the Broadcasting Development Fund, six radio stations in Taiwan are controlled by the KMT's Broadcasting Corporation of China and four other stations are also predominantly controlled by the pan-blue camp.
The so-called "underground radio stations" have actually been created by the unfair system by which the pan-blue camp monopolizes radio channels.
The NCC also applies a double standard when dealing with underground radio stations.
The Broadcasting Development Fund has said that the NCC is not closing down a pan-blue radio station like Voice of the New Party, even though it is located right in Taipei, while traveling all the way to Taichung just to close down Ocean Voice Radio.
Furthermore, the NCC has not moved against TVBS even though it is funded by "100 percent foreign investment," despite a law that says foreign investment cannot account for more than half of the funding of a company.
Control
All of this serves to demonstrate that the KMT uses terms like "underground" or "illegal" as excuses to control the media -- the real reason it seeks to close such stations is because they support the pan-green camp.
Today the NCC, which is controlled by the KMT, is still monopolizing and controlling the media.
The KMT is well aware that monopolizing freedom of speech means that the monopolizers can control the understanding of history.
Taiwan is a democracy, but until the pan-blue camp's media monopoly is broken, there is still a long way to go.
Cao Changqing is a Chinese writer based in the US.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations