Reef Check, an international organization dedicated to coral reef conservation, issued an online petition called Reef Check Declaration of Reef Rights, which received strong support. In just three days, Taiwanese reef lovers joined the cause, catapulting Taiwan to No. 2 on the list of signatories between the first-place US and third-place Malaysia.
But even as Taiwanese throw their support behind this noble cause, I've seen a newspaper report that said: "Stop wasting energy focusing all attention on how humans have destroyed coral reefs. Finding a way to artificially mass reproduce wild shallow-water coral reefs is the key to saving coral ecology in Taiwanese waters."
I must ask why focusing attention on human destruction is a waste of energy. And can humans really mass reproduce wild coral and save Taiwan's coral ecology?
First, just as the reality of global warming is threatening the world climate, coral reefs are facing an unprecedented crisis. As the Reef Check Web site says, we have already lost 15 percent of the world's coral and 30 percent is directly in danger of destruction because of human activities. If we weren't able to halt or slow this decline, more than 200 million people living on Pacific islands would have their livelihoods affected.
The petition states that all coral reefs have the right to be free from destruction from over-fishing, pollution, artificial coral bleaching, ocean acidification, and damage due to poorly planned coastal development. The organization hopes 1 million people will sign the declaration, and, when the International Year of the Reef begins next year, to use those signatures to appeal to all reef countries to protect their reefs.
Is it really a waste of energy for Taiwan, whose diverse coral ecology should be a source of national pride, to work with the rest of the world to eliminate human activities that destroy coral habitats?
Wild shallow-water reefs and reef-building coral are an important part of the tropical and sub-tropical coral reef ecosystem. This kind of ecosystem has existed on earth for more than 250 million years. But coral-building reefs grow very slowly, whether by sexuallor asexual reproduction. The fastest, acropora coral, grows at 20cm per year, while the slowest, porites corals, grows at just 3mm per year.
Moreover, coral reefs require other living organisms in addition to the coral. These include fish, shrimp, shellfish, seaweed and other micro-organisms invisible to the naked eye, all of which make for a complex system. In addition, coral reefs normally develop in clear-water areas free from land pollution.
The waters surrounding Taiwan have long since become overused and polluted. Even if we can mass reproduce reef-building coral, how could we give it a place to survive?
The only purpose for breeding coral is so that it can be used for commercial purpose in aquariums in place of harvested wild coral. There are simply no scientific reports proving that mass reproduction of reef-making coral can save coral ecosystems. If this were really possible, where is all the coral that has been transplanted on to man-made reefs? If this technology really existed in Taiwan, how is it saving the coral reefs? Where is the data? Why hasn't it been published in an international academic journal to be tested by peer review? All of this needs to be explained through scientific testing. Otherwise it is but fake science.
In 1997, Taiwanese academics established the Taiwanese Coral Reef Society, and in 1998 began participating in Reef Check activities. In 1999, Taiwan experienced the largest reef-bleaching incident in history, leading to the destruction of much of the coral reefs in Taiwan's surrounding waters. But with great efforts over the last decade, Taiwanese society has gradually come to understand coral ecology's importance to Taiwan's marine environment.
The establishment of Dongsha Marine National Park this year symbolizes our gradual movement into an era of respecting the ocean and protecting coral reefs. Just as concern over global warming has encouraged people to ride bicycles to work, efforts like these are anything but a waste of energy.
Allen Chen is an assistant research fellow in the Institute of Zoology at the Academia Sinica.
Translated by Marc Langer
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) first took office in 2016, she set ambitious goals for remaking the energy mix in Taiwan. At the core of this effort was a significant expansion of the percentage of renewable energy generated to keep pace with growing domestic and global demands to reduce emissions. This effort met with broad bipartisan support as all three major parties placed expanding renewable energy at the center of their energy platforms. However, over the past several years partisanship has become a major headwind in realizing a set of energy goals that all three parties profess to want. Tsai
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told a news conference on Jan. 9, in response to China’s latest round of live-fire exercises in the Taiwan Strait: “India has an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our trade, economic, people-to-people and maritime interests. We urge all parties to exercise restraint, avoid unilateral actions and resolve issues peacefully without threat or use of force.” The statement set a firm tone at the beginning of the year for India-Taiwan relations, and reflects New Delhi’s recognition of shared interests and the strategic importance of regional stability. While India
A survey released on Wednesday by the Taiwan Inspiration Association (TIA) offered a stark look into public feeling on national security. Its results indicate concern over the nation’s defensive capability as well as skepticism about the government’s ability to safeguard it. Slightly more than 70 percent of respondents said they do not believe Taiwan has sufficient capacity to defend itself in the event of war, saying there is a lack of advanced military hardware. At the same time, 62.5 percent opposed the opposition’s efforts to block the government’s NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.6 billion) special defense budget. More than half of respondents — 56.4
RSS