What will the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) presidential hopeful Frank Hsieh's (
International competitiveness begins at home. As international competition strategist and Harvard professor Michael Porter says: "Paradoxically, the enduring competitive advantages in a global economy lie increasingly in local things -- knowledge, relationships and motivation that distant rivals cannot match."
A company's competitive advantage is the most important factor affecting its competitiveness, and such advantages are determined by the effective use of production factors. This requires constant innovation, which in turn requires cooperation with academia.
Collaboration between industrial and academic circles thus becomes the source of competitiveness. Silicon Valley in California, Research Triangle Park in North Carolina and Hsinchu Science Park are all successful examples.
Such collaboration applies not only to the high-tech industry but also to the agricultural and general industries. Taiwan's achievements in this respect are much greater than China's, and should not be underestimated. Taiwan's orchid exhibition this year, another successful example of industry-academia collaboration, resulted in orders worth several billion US dollars.
Second, the world is not flat. Many Taiwanese treat Thomas Friedman's bestseller The World Is Flat as their Bible and use it to criticize the government's business policy. However, Harvard professor Pankaj Ghemawat says that this and similar books, such as The Death of Distance by Frances Cairncross, are only sensationalist statements.
Ghemawat says foreign direct investment accounted for just 10 percent of total global investments between 2003 and 2005, which means that 90 percent of investments actually were domestic. If the world were flat, proportions would be reversed.
Other areas related to internationalization such as international migration, and international telecommunications, research and education, charitable donations, patents, stock investments and trade account for less than 10 percent of GDP. It is evident that the world is not flat.
Third, the Chinese market is one of Taiwan's markets, not the only one. Today, about 70 percent of foreign investments by Taiwanese companies is concentrated on China, the highest in the world. This runs counter to common sense. You should not put all your eggs in one basket.
Some commentators like to cite South Korea as an example, but the fact is that Seoul has been promoting global investments in recent years. Hyundai Motor Co is the second-largest company in India, a huge market of 1.1 billion people, and white wares from LG Electronics and Samsung Electronics have a 30 percent to 40 percent market share.
According to the Indian government's official statistics, by the end of March, South Korea's total investment in India was about 70 times more than that of Taiwan. The Indian market is gigantic, and it is highly complementary to Taiwan. By investing in China, Taiwan can eventually enter the US market. By investing in India, it will eventually be able to enter the emerging Central Asian, Eastern and even Western European markets. India is thus the best jumping board for the global arrangement of Taiwanese businesspeople.
Hopefully, Hsieh's team will remember these three principles for promoting global arrangement on a Taiwanese foundation and create another economic miracle for Taiwan.
Mark Wen is a professor in the department of civil education and leadership at National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
RSS