Iraq is a tragic problem for the US and its allies, but hopefully a temporary one. Thankfully the old USSR is gone, no matter how hard Vladimir Putin might attempt to put it together again. But another potential superpower makes many Americans uneasy: China.
China is increasingly asserting itself around the globe.
With the world's largest population, swiftly growing economy, ancient culture, and authoritarian politics, the People's Republic of China (PRC) is seen as an almost inevitable US rival. Some analysts even view war as likely.
The Council on Foreign Relations recently released a new task force report on US-China relations, filled with the usual generic recommendations: "Improving economic relations," "Enhancing security relations," "Encouraging political reform," etc. Whether there is political will on both sides of the Pacific to achieve these ends is the real issue.
Even today, any confrontation between the US and the PRC, a nuclear-armed power with regional reach, would be far different than US' wars with Serbia and Iraq. A future US-China conflict could become a global conflagration.
Moreover, a friendly PRC could help resolve a range of lesser security and political issues, such a potential nuclear North Korea. Finally, there's the potential benefit of a continuing economic relationship. Whither relations between the two nations? There's no cause for the touch of paranoia that afflicts some US policymakers. Today the US stands astride the globe as a colossus, with the world's most productive economy, dominant military, and ubiquitous culture. Equally important, the People's Republic of China is no substitute for the Soviet Union.
Uncle Sam need not follow an "anything goes" policy so long as US companies make money. But the worst strategy would be to treat the PRC as an enemy.
First, China is no longer communist in the traditional sense, with as much as two-thirds of the economy outside of government control, increasing personal autonomy, and not even a pretense of promoting world revolution. With only a hint of a smile Chinese officials spoke to me in Beijing of "socialism with Chinese characteristics." Second, international integration has helped erode China's old totalitarian state. Foreign investment and trade have given China a stake in a peaceful global order.
Third, though Shanghai, Beijing, and other leading cities should impress visitors, rural China remains a century behind. Chinese officials estimate Shanghai's per capita GDP at about US$14,000, but that of China nationally at only US$1,700.
In 2005 America's per capita GDP ran to US$42,000. Assuming recent growth rates continue -- unlikely as the Chinese economy matures -- the PRC's GDP won't surpass that of the US until 2035, and even then the US' per capita production will be four times as great.
Fourth, trade with China is largely beneficial to the US. Although disputes dominate news headlines, similar concerns emerged and ultimately disappeared regarding Japan. Today few Americans worry about Japan overtaking the US.
Fifth, the PRC isn't likely to catch up to the US militarily until mid-century at the earliest.
Beijing will be able to match the US in East Asia more quickly, but Washington's current advantage has always been artificial: the US cannot expect to forever dominate every region on earth.
Maintaining US influence will require thoughtful diplomacy and economic openness.
But Washington has the advantage of being allied with most of China's neighbors.
Of course, the PRC pessimists could be right. But treating China as an inevitable enemy and embarking upon a strategy of containment are far more likely to turn the PRC hostile.
Nor is such a policy sustainable. None of Washington's friends in East Asia want to turn themselves into a target of China. Engaging in economic war makes no more sense. Maybe such a policy would hurt the PRC more than the US, but it would be mutually destructive in any case.
Perhaps most important, the US should put its own house in order. Washington should push freer trade throughout Asia, develop a cooperative strategy towards China with allied states, and improve its international image.
The US also should improve its economic competitiveness.
China today is more free, more prosperous, and more responsible than China only a few years ago. There still is reason for the US to be watchful and wary about Beijing's policies.
But the US is acting from a position of strength, and should confidently engage, rather than timidly isolate, what is likely to be the world's next great power.
The benefits of cementing a mutually constructive relationship in the coming decades would be enormous.
Doug Bandow is vice president of Citizen Outreach and the Cobden Fellow in International Economics at IPI.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.