On Friday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) revoked Minister of National Defense Lee Jye's (
The reason cited by the KMT's Evaluation and Disciplinary Committee is a perfect illustration of the party's confusion when it comes to prioritizing loyalty to the country versus that to the party.
The KMT's move comes at a critical time, when it has a good chance of regaining the presidency after eight years of DPP rule. While the action against Lee may have helped consolidate and unify the party's hardliners, it will do little -- and could even alienate -- moderates and non-partisan voters.
From the KMT's perspective, Lee committed a grievous sin by saying he would "only listen" to the ruling party. The KMT blasted him for "seriously jeopardizing military ethics" and for "fawning" over the DPP government. Such statements reflect fundamental misconceptions that just highlight how out of touch the KMT is with the times.
The KMT logic dictates that since the party helped found the "Republic of China," the nation and the party are one and the same. Consequently, although the KMT is now the opposition party and the DPP has the right to govern on behalf of the people, it is wrong for Lee, as a government official, to follow the instructions of the DPP government and put them ahead of party interests.
The KMT seems to have overlooked the fact that this nation belongs to the people and the power resides in the people, not the KMT -- regardless of whether the nation is called the "Republic of China," the "Republic of China on Taiwan," or the "Republic of Taiwan."
The people gave executive power to Chen Shui-bian (
The KMT's backward mentality makes one highly suspicious and skeptical of any proposal to form a "joint government" composed of members from different political parties.
If government officials from different parties decided to listen only to their own parties whenever there is a clash of opinions, not only would the chairman of the opposition party be essentially allowed to wield powers comparable to those of the president, but the operation of the entire government would come to a standstill.
Almost all KMT members who have held posts in the DPP government have at one time or another faced allegations of "betraying" their party. Witness what happened to Tang Fei (
The tension is worst when the post is related to security and the military. The friction between Lee and his party simply built up over time.
First was the standoff between the DPP government and the pan-blue camp over the special budget for arms purchases. This was followed by several incidents in which members of the military were sanctioned or punished for acting in opposition to the president and the government. The removal of the late dictator Chiang Kai-shek's (
In the absence of affiliation with any political party, Lee will at last be able to perform his job impartially without any strings attached. How bad can that possibly be?
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
The wrap-up press event on Feb. 1 for the new local period suspense film Murder of the Century (世紀血案), adapted from the true story of the Lin family murders (林家血案) in 1980, has sparked waves of condemnation in the past week, as well as a boycott. The film is based on the shocking, unsolved murders that occurred at then-imprisoned provincial councilor and democracy advocate Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) residence on Feb. 28, 1980, while Lin was detained for his participation in the Formosa Incident, in which police and protesters clashed during a pro-democracy rally in Kaohsiung organized by Formosa Magazine on Dec.
RSS