On Friday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) revoked Minister of National Defense Lee Jye's (
The reason cited by the KMT's Evaluation and Disciplinary Committee is a perfect illustration of the party's confusion when it comes to prioritizing loyalty to the country versus that to the party.
The KMT's move comes at a critical time, when it has a good chance of regaining the presidency after eight years of DPP rule. While the action against Lee may have helped consolidate and unify the party's hardliners, it will do little -- and could even alienate -- moderates and non-partisan voters.
From the KMT's perspective, Lee committed a grievous sin by saying he would "only listen" to the ruling party. The KMT blasted him for "seriously jeopardizing military ethics" and for "fawning" over the DPP government. Such statements reflect fundamental misconceptions that just highlight how out of touch the KMT is with the times.
The KMT logic dictates that since the party helped found the "Republic of China," the nation and the party are one and the same. Consequently, although the KMT is now the opposition party and the DPP has the right to govern on behalf of the people, it is wrong for Lee, as a government official, to follow the instructions of the DPP government and put them ahead of party interests.
The KMT seems to have overlooked the fact that this nation belongs to the people and the power resides in the people, not the KMT -- regardless of whether the nation is called the "Republic of China," the "Republic of China on Taiwan," or the "Republic of Taiwan."
The people gave executive power to Chen Shui-bian (
The KMT's backward mentality makes one highly suspicious and skeptical of any proposal to form a "joint government" composed of members from different political parties.
If government officials from different parties decided to listen only to their own parties whenever there is a clash of opinions, not only would the chairman of the opposition party be essentially allowed to wield powers comparable to those of the president, but the operation of the entire government would come to a standstill.
Almost all KMT members who have held posts in the DPP government have at one time or another faced allegations of "betraying" their party. Witness what happened to Tang Fei (
The tension is worst when the post is related to security and the military. The friction between Lee and his party simply built up over time.
First was the standoff between the DPP government and the pan-blue camp over the special budget for arms purchases. This was followed by several incidents in which members of the military were sanctioned or punished for acting in opposition to the president and the government. The removal of the late dictator Chiang Kai-shek's (
In the absence of affiliation with any political party, Lee will at last be able to perform his job impartially without any strings attached. How bad can that possibly be?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath