Scientists have drilled ice cores under the Antarctic to examine the climate in ancient times. The sediments inside the ice cores are like tree rings. Experts are able to understand the climate during different periods by comparing the oxygen isotopes inside ice cores from different depths, and even analyze the amount of greenhouse gases through the bubbles inside.
Based on historical data, scientists have confirmed that the temperature on the earth's surface has risen drastically over the past two centuries and that there has been an abnormal rise in the amount of greenhouse gases in the air. They have also confirmed a direct proportional relationship between the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and the use of fossil fuels, which means that there is no longer any doubt that global warming is a result of the widespread use of fossil fuels since the industrial revolution.
Most scientists believe that the temperature rise has been caused by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide which hinder heat dissipation.
A small minority of scientists have a different view, believing that the rise falls within the scope of statistical change. They believe it is a natural temperature rise following the end of a little ice age, changes in energy released by the Sun or an expansion of the urbanization effect.
I haven't been able to find any data on the effects of the heat released through energy use on global temperatures, but my rough estimate is that it may increase temperatures by about 1oC.
Global warming will have the following impact. First, the thinning and shrinking of the polar ice caps, ice and snow on high mountains and glaciers and the break-up of Arctic icebergs mean that the global sea level may rise by between 1m to 6m by the end of the century. Since half of the world's population lives within 100km of a coastline, this will lead to a redistribution of the population.
Second, drastic weather changes, land desertification, the extinction of numerous species and major relocations of humans and animals.
Third, changes in the agricultural and fishery industries and plant and animal ecology will have a deep effect on the human economy and livelihood.
Fourth, the spread of infectious diseases and changes to the ecological environment will affect human health.
We have the following options. First, set an aggressive schedule for a major carbon reduction campaign. We should inform and educate the general public and industry on how to use less fossil energy and promote the renewable energy industry. We should also improve the energy efficiency of electrical home appliances and production machinery while enacting new tax policies to regulate energy use and make people cut down on fossil fuels in order to cut energy use by at least 10 percent in five years.
The second option is to adjust industrial structure. The government should push for a move from manufacturing to the service, cultural and knowledge industries, and industry should consider how to achieve this.
The third option is to complete the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant as soon as possible. From the perspective of energy safety, nuclear power is the most reliable alternative both as the main and a backup source of energy. Provided there are quality and safety guarantees, we should complete the plant as soon as possible.
Most importantly, both the general public and politicians should actively consider ways to respond to the issue and hurry to establish a new energy policy.
The most frightening aspect is that the government is ignoring the urgency of the matter.
Tsong Tien-tzou is a research fellow in the Institute of Physics at the Academia Sinica. Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS