Two years after the Indian Ocean tsunami which wreaked havoc on the coastlines of Indonesia, Thailand, Sri Lanka and the Maldives, the countries worst affected by the disaster are still a long way from recovery -- and tourism is partly to blame, a tourism charity said.
While many luxury hotels were up and running and welcoming tourists within weeks of the Dec. 26 tsunami, hundreds of thousands of homes needed by survivors have still not been rebuilt.
Thousands of people still live in makeshift shacks, only a third of those made homeless have been rehoused, and much of the aid money raised remains unused. UN agencies have yet to spend half of the ?3.7 billion (US$7.2 billion) pledged or donated by governments and other bodies.
Aside from corruption, poor management and bureaucracy marring the recovery process, tourism has also had a negative impact on the local communities that are struggling to rebuild. Tourism Concern, a charity that fights exploitation in tourism, says that government, big business and holidaymakers have been a higher priority than the well-being of local communities.
Kelly Haynes, who has coordinated research in the affected countries for the charity, says a second disaster is taking shape and that there needs to be a public outcry about the unspent billions.
"Governments have used the devastation of the tsunami as an opportunity to push through tourism strategies that drastically affect local coastal communities," she says. "Local communities now find themselves disempowered and their rights and interests marginalized."
In a report published two years after the tsunami, Tourism Concern investigates the recovery of the countries affected and describes many examples of local people being sidelined in favor of tourism projects.
In Sri Lanka, as in Thailand and India, new 'conservation buffer zones" mean that people are not allowed to rebuild their homes on the beach. Fishing communities are being moved inland largely because of tourism developments and a desire to make the beaches look tidier, Tourism Concern director Tricia Barnett says.
In Tamil Nadu, for example, 300 families have been forced to live on 2.5 hectares of land compared with the 6.5 hectares they occupied in the village of Karikkakattukup-pam, because the government has earmarked the rest of the land for tourism.
The report describes how Burmese refugees living in Khao Lak in Thailand are being exploited as underpaid construction workers for the hotel industry. In one case, 80 people were not paid for six months' labor, and others were beaten for asking for wages.
Other problems include the series of tsunami-related tourist attractions that have been planned by the Tourism Authority of Thailand, including a "tsunami trail tour" and a "tsunami memorial museum," which some local people oppose and were not consulted about, and a hotel chain that is trying to evict villagers from land it says it owns, despite the fact that a Thai NGO has established the company's deeds are false.
In the aftermath of the tsunami, the tourist boards of Sri Lanka, Thailand and the Maldives urged foreign visitors to return immediately, so their money would reach local people.
Even after two years, tourist arrivals are down 40 percent to Thailand and 46 percent to the Maldives, compared with pre-tsunami levels, and the tourism industry says boosting these figures is crucial to recovery.
"Tourism really makes a difference," says Pete Burell, who has organized community projects in Sri Lanka for the adventure operator Exodus, paid for by its customers' donations.
Volunteer travel specialists such as I-to-I set up tsunami relief projects and have sent a steady stream of paying volunteers to do aid work.
"Local community members requested the name of our project be changed to omit the word `tsunami' around six months ago," Jo Little of I-to-I says. "The main focus now is on helping the community move on and get back on their feet."
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS