China's rapid economic development has increased its need for energy and pushed the "Chinese energy strategy" to an unprecedented level of complexity. The energy issue will certainly be a key focus in the country's future economic development policy.
Taiwan also faces a desperate shortage of energy, as 99 percent of its oil is imported. However, China's new energy strategy of "an international diversification of oil sources" will surely cause oil prices to rise over the long term. In response to that trend, the government should take the following measures.
To begin with, it should pay close attention to China's energy strategies of "oil supply diversity" and "emergency strategic reserves" and study whether such strategies would affect the nation's oil supplies.
Further, the government should mirror what the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) has done and form an agency responsible for trade talks. The agency should be able to use Taiwan's massive foreign reserves to seek cooperation with international energy companies, improve drilling techniques and promote energy exploration and production to serve the needs of national economic development.
The government should also reward and push companies to research and develop renewable energy and power-saving technologies -- such as solar power -- and avoid excessive energy demand by creating more economical products.
The fourth nuclear power plant should be completed and the feasibility of delaying the retirement of the three other nuclear power plants should be studied unitl renewable and solar energy sources become available. The delayed retirement could reduce reliance on thermal power plants and oil while decreasing the production of carbon dioxide.
Finally, the current low-pricing policy for oil has not only distorted the industrial sector -- leading to the expansion of high consumers of energy -- but also affected efforts at energy conservation and the development of renewable sources of energy.
The government should respect market mechanisms and adjust the industrial structure appropriately.
Kuo Kuo-hsing is an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of International Trade at Chinese Culture University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.