Premier Su Tseng-chang's (
This line of argument was previously used by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
It is repeated today with the double standard expressed through KMT Legislator Hong Hsiu-chu's (
To which I ask Hong, on what basis? In both cases, past and current political figures at nearly all levels of the national administration, working within a state structure inherited from a corrupt authoritarian government, have been the beneficiaries of certain funds over which far less than rigorous accounting has been exercised.
The President is indicted over embezzlement but prosecutors ignore former KMT chairmen Lien Chan (
The a historical and illogical reasoning of Su and Hong is symptomatic of Taiwan's rapid development, which symbolically and physically has rapidly built over history that is unpleasant to the eye or the mind, or which might later be evidence of deep scale corruption amongst ruling elites on all sides of the political spectrum.
Forget history! Build for the future! But what future? In what country? Under whose rules? I believe it is deeply destructive and counter-productive to disregard, simplify, apologize away or sensationalize history. It also undermines any current attempt to establish an honest political and judicial system that has integrity.
Premier Su's comments fall into the trap of the apologist, for which he can be rightly criticized, offering as he does universal absolution without requiring any repentance or future intent of honesty on the part of the still living guilty.
However, the current shambles of politicians and media egoists running around slapping each other with lawsuits is also an unsustainable form of democratic expression and simply reveals itself for what it is, a cut-throat, winner takes all, zero sum game for Taiwan, whether conducted legally or physically.
It is unsurprising that Taiwan struggles to come to terms with it's past and find it's identity. Many of the leading countries in the world face a similar problem. The Taiwanese can choose to emulate Premier Su, and my neighbor, who proudly wears a German Wehrmacht World War II motorcycle helmet as a fashion accessory, oblivious to and uncaring of it's historical context, or they can choose a more constructive approach.
Since compromise is often an end result of war, why not start at that position? One idea could be to declare a general amnesty for all government officials at all levels, including the president.
This would be done in lieu of a referendum on a new Constitution and national title, fresh elections for all national governmental positions (with incumbents prevented from running), the restructuring of the national government with a clear separation of powers, the establishment of an independent military that is loyal to the polity of Taiwan and not the Republic of China and an amnesty for the KMT and their assets, should they rescind their pledge of unification (read economic opportunism) and recognize and swear loyalty to Taiwan whether they are the ruling or opposition party?
In this way, Chinese elites and their assets would not be threatened and in return they would be required to share the burden of living in, protecting and nurturing this country in the face of China's imperial ambitions (read internal disintegration).
Ben Goren
Kaohsiung
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS