The Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) has invited British independent verification and validation company Lloyd's Register to certify the safety of the new high-speed rail system. But as Lloyd's Register has yet to give its final stamp of approval, Minister of Transportation and Communica-tion Tsai Duei (
The current plan is to have 19 services running in each direction per day in the initial stage of operation, or about only one train every 55 minutes.This is far short of the number stipulated in the build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract, which says that the THSRC must be able to prove its system is capable of handling one train every four minutes.
The THSRC's inability to run enough trains could very well be a result of not having enough qualified drivers. The company is hiring foreign drivers, but it is not clear at this point how these drivers would obtain the necessary clearance to operate local trains. The THSRC's need for qualified drivers may become more pressing as the number of daily runs increases, so the ministry should carefully consider that this shortage may become more severe when the line opens for service.
Aside from train drivers, operations and control center personnel, train conductors and station heads also have an important role to play. Whether or not these employees are familiar with operating rules, and whether or not they will be able to effectively implement them in their work, will certainly have an impact on safety throughout the system.
Nor should the ministry ignore whether or not those responsible for safety are qualified to work on the high-speed rail. A lack of experienced dispatchers or personnel to handle traveler problems during emergencies could increase safety risks throughout the system.
In the past, completing a public transportation project on or before its deadline was viewed asea political accomplishment. However, the high-speed rail has been constructed under a BOT model, so the private companies involved must shoulder the profits and losses incurred during the time they have been given to operate these systems.
The THSRC should treat this operation as a new public model of transportation. It should provide a product which is fundamentally sound to inspire public trust and build up its image as a fast, punctual, safe and comfortable mode of transportation.
It is therefore good to proceed cautiously when deciding when to open the line and remember that it is not a race. If we make hasty decisions, the high-speed rail could be dogged by the same problems that have hounded the Hsuehshan Tunnel and the electronic toll collection system.
As soon as the service opens, the THSRC will have to begin paying interest on its NT$230 billion (US$6.9 billion) syndicated loan. There might only be 30,000 passengers per day at the beginning, putting ticket revenues at no more than NT$50 million. With heavy interest payments from the loan, revenue projections in the initial stage wouldn't be very good.
But delaying the opening until more runs can be fit into each day will increase overall profit, which could ease much of the pressure when the line opens. In my optimistic estimation, if the rail could start by spring next year, three trains can be scheduled per hour, with the trains running from Banciao in Taipei County to Tsoying in Kaohsiung County in 90 minutes. This in itself will be a fine accomplishment.
What's even more important is to establish a comprehensive system to monitor the tracks as soon as possible to ensure safety after operation begins.
Cheng Yung-hsiang is an assistant professor at National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Marc Langer
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS