The Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) has invited British independent verification and validation company Lloyd's Register to certify the safety of the new high-speed rail system. But as Lloyd's Register has yet to give its final stamp of approval, Minister of Transportation and Communica-tion Tsai Duei (
The current plan is to have 19 services running in each direction per day in the initial stage of operation, or about only one train every 55 minutes.This is far short of the number stipulated in the build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract, which says that the THSRC must be able to prove its system is capable of handling one train every four minutes.
The THSRC's inability to run enough trains could very well be a result of not having enough qualified drivers. The company is hiring foreign drivers, but it is not clear at this point how these drivers would obtain the necessary clearance to operate local trains. The THSRC's need for qualified drivers may become more pressing as the number of daily runs increases, so the ministry should carefully consider that this shortage may become more severe when the line opens for service.
Aside from train drivers, operations and control center personnel, train conductors and station heads also have an important role to play. Whether or not these employees are familiar with operating rules, and whether or not they will be able to effectively implement them in their work, will certainly have an impact on safety throughout the system.
Nor should the ministry ignore whether or not those responsible for safety are qualified to work on the high-speed rail. A lack of experienced dispatchers or personnel to handle traveler problems during emergencies could increase safety risks throughout the system.
In the past, completing a public transportation project on or before its deadline was viewed asea political accomplishment. However, the high-speed rail has been constructed under a BOT model, so the private companies involved must shoulder the profits and losses incurred during the time they have been given to operate these systems.
The THSRC should treat this operation as a new public model of transportation. It should provide a product which is fundamentally sound to inspire public trust and build up its image as a fast, punctual, safe and comfortable mode of transportation.
It is therefore good to proceed cautiously when deciding when to open the line and remember that it is not a race. If we make hasty decisions, the high-speed rail could be dogged by the same problems that have hounded the Hsuehshan Tunnel and the electronic toll collection system.
As soon as the service opens, the THSRC will have to begin paying interest on its NT$230 billion (US$6.9 billion) syndicated loan. There might only be 30,000 passengers per day at the beginning, putting ticket revenues at no more than NT$50 million. With heavy interest payments from the loan, revenue projections in the initial stage wouldn't be very good.
But delaying the opening until more runs can be fit into each day will increase overall profit, which could ease much of the pressure when the line opens. In my optimistic estimation, if the rail could start by spring next year, three trains can be scheduled per hour, with the trains running from Banciao in Taipei County to Tsoying in Kaohsiung County in 90 minutes. This in itself will be a fine accomplishment.
What's even more important is to establish a comprehensive system to monitor the tracks as soon as possible to ensure safety after operation begins.
Cheng Yung-hsiang is an assistant professor at National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Marc Langer
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS