Last Thursday, Keelung Mayor Hsu Tsai-li (許財利) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was sentenced to seven years in prison and deprived of his civil rights for eight years after being found guilty of corruption. He had used his position to facilitate a land deal for his own profit.
Last December, when Hsu was running for re-election, he was already under suspicion, but Taipei Mayor and KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) campaigned for him anyway and he won. In May, Hsu was formally indicted.
What was Ma's reaction? He refused to revoke Hsu's KMT membership because, he said, being indicted does not constitute guilt.
It is true: Indictment does not constitute guilt. Remember that as Point One.
In the meantime, former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh (
The supposed theme of their anti-Chen campaign is "anti-corruption."
But is the president guilty of anything? No.
Has the president been indicted for anything? No.
Still, at Shih's and the pan-blue camp's insistence, a president who has not even been indicted must step down from office. Remember that as Point Two.
Who has been indicted? The president's son-in-law -- on insider trading.
Let us return to Point One. The aspersion of guilt in this case is not on the president but on his son-in-law. For Shih's Red Guard, the president must therefore step down.
We thus move on to Hau Lung-bin (
Hau Lung-bin, however, should not withdraw his candidacy because indictment does not constitute guilt. Besides, it is his father who is under scrutiny, and not him.
And he is KMT.
Ma's position on all of this is hard to define.
He flip-flops depending on who he is talking to. He has apologized and then he has not. He has said that an apology is not necessary.
After all, Hsu was first elected mayor when Lien Chan (
That latter remark may be debatable, but Ma seems to have forgotten we are not comparing corruption with corruption. Instead, we have a convicted, corrupt mayor being held up against a president who has not been convicted or even indicted.
There has been no rush by Shih Ming-teh's Red Guard to the ramparts of Keelung to say that justice has been done, that corruption has been found, and that Hsu Tsai-li should be hung from the highest tree.
As a matter of fact, we have heard no mention of the search for corruption in Keelung on in any other area where a pan-blue candidate is in office or in the running.
Point Three, therefore, is more of a question than a point: How long should the people of Taipei and Taiwan put up with the foolishness, hypocrisy and disruptiveness of Shih Ming-teh's Red Guard?
How long should the city have to pay for extra police hours, trash collection and obstruction of traffic and city services to satisfy the ego of a man who has long been out of a job, a man who has not won an election in over eight years but who hankers desperately for the limelight?
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS