Five years after he swept to power talking tough on reform, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi steps down this month, leaving a dramatically different economic landscape than the one he inherited.
Experts, however, are divided on how much credit the colorful 64-year-old maverick can take for piloting the world's second-largest economy out of the "lost decade of deflation" and back on track to sustained growth.
"Koizumi reform was more rhetoric than fact," said professor Eisuke Sakakibara of Waseda University, a former top finance official nicknamed "Mr Yen" because of his ability to influence the markets.
"Reforms in Japan have been implemented by the corporate sector, by the corporate managers. Mr Koizumi had nothing to do with those corporate structural reforms," he said in an interview.
Koizumi, who bows out voluntarily as Japan's longest-serving premier in three decades, set out to slash public works spending and clean up bad debts that were suffocating the banking sector.
Asia's largest economy, which for more than a decade was blighted by stagnant growth and on-off recessions, is now on course to its longest sustained recovery in postwar times.
Deflation finally appears to be beaten, and the shopping malls are thronging as domestic demand picks up.
Koizumi has won much praise, particularly overseas, for his economic stewardship, in particular his decision to privatize the national post office with its huge pool of savings that makes it in effect the world's largest bank.
However, some observers say the recovery owes more to the booming Chinese economy and corporate sector restructuring than to Koizumi's policies.
The government's finances remain in poor shape, with debt equivalent to over 160 percent of GDP after the government tried to resuscitate the economy with a series of emergency spending packages.
"Public structural reform is still undone," Sakakibara said.
"What [Koizumi] had to do was structural reform of the public sector. That has not been done. We are still running huge deficits and we have not raised any taxes. We have not cut expenditures by a dramatic amount," he added.
Even so, there is little doubt that Koizumi has left his mark, most notably by pushing through privatization of the post office.
For years the US$3 trillion that the mail operator sits atop in savings and life insurance policies provided a vast pool of funds to bankroll often wasteful but politically popular public works projects.
Koizumi even gambled his leadership at snap elections a year ago to crush political opposition to his career-long goal of breaking the mail monopoly.
The stubborn third-generation politician is widely expected to be succeeded by the young conservative Shinzo Abe, now chief Cabinet secretary, who has yet to spell out a clear economic agenda.
Unlike rival candidate Sadakazu Tanigaki -- the finance minister who has proposed raising the sales tax to 10 percent from the current 5 percent -- Abe has shown little desire to tinker with the politically sensitive levy.
Whoever follows Koizumi faces challenges from an aging population, declining birthrate and widening social inequalities, not to mention sour relations with Asian neighbors including China, a major trading partner.
"Abe is widely expected to follow the fiscal and economic reforms pursued by Koizumi, but the bigger question may be whether the current environment is conducive to such policies," said Barclays Capital economist James Barber.
"The reforms passed by Koizumi are being widely blamed for creating economic and social disparities in Japan," he added.
Robert Feldman, Morgan Stanley's chief economist for Japan, believes that Abe's philosophy is quite similar to that of Koizumi.
"Investors can be cautiously optimistic that Koizumi's reform policies will continue, and that bureaucratic guerrilla resistance will fail," he said.
Less clear, he added, is whether relations with China would improve if Abe succeeds Koizumi, who has irked Asian neighbors with his regular trips to a controversial war shrine and his more assertive foreign policy.
"Abe appeals for a separation of economic and political issues with China. It remains unclear whether China will accept Abe's appeal," Feldman said.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is