The rapid growth of China's economic and national strength has misled people into believing that it is a developed country. However, judging by the recent prison sentences handed down to New York Times researcher Zhao Yan (
According to the Measures for Administering the Release of News and Information in China by Foreign News Agencies issued on Sunday, the official Xinhua news agency will be both a key player and the sole referee in the media marketplace. The rules give a long list of "don'ts" for the foreign media, including not violating the Constitution or the nation's sovereignty, national security or religious policies. The foreign media has also been told not to promote evil cults, spread false information, disrupt the economy or undermine social stability.
Article 11 of the new regulations specifies that the foreign media shall not "undermine social ethics or the fine cultural traditions of the Chinese nation, or include other content banned by Chinese laws and administrative regulations."
The press restrictions are not only broad and indiscriminate, they are also supposed to apply to news agencies in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau. If prohibited material is found in any reports from those areas, Xinhua can delete it. Xinhua can also give the offending agency a warning, demand a correction, suspend its release of specified materials or suspend or revoke the agency's permit for operating in China.
Of course, China's domestic news agencies have long been under Beijing's thumb and efforts to widen the scope of their reporting have usually been quickly quashed. Nevertheless, Sunday's pronouncement was a great step backward for China. The Hong Kong Journalists Association has protested the regulations, as have press associations and activists in many other countries.
With the keyword-based blocking of information from Web sites, including Google and Wikipedia, and e-mails, the strict regulations placed on foreign print media, the prohibition of wireless, cable and satellite TV and the new restrictions on foreign news agencies, the Chinese people are only able to see sanitized information that their government wants them to see.
Beijing has been fighting an uphill battle for several years to maintain the iron curtain it erected to keep foreign media from "poisoning" its people and eroding the foundation of the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) grip on power.
While the new regulations have been widely -- and appropriately -- condemned, they also signal how desperate China's rearguard battle to defend its media "whiteout" has become. Its relations with the rest of the world are becoming closer by the day, its society is moving toward freedom and all-pervasive broadcasting technology is becoming more widespread. Technological advances are corroding the iron curtain even as China's rapid economic growth is driving it toward greater openness, internationalization and liberalization.
Political and social regression will not only hinder economic development, but create new social tensions. As the CCP works to expand its ties with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), perhaps it should pause to reflect on the latter's fate. The KMT imposed strict media controls in Taiwan for decades, but in the end could no longer hold back the flood of information that came with the country's economic and political development.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry